It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by q_ball
I thought so too, but wasnt it ironic that Lennon was becoming very political and very famous with opposing views from the mainstream
Now Absurd as this sounds, I should put forward that the points made are that the Beatles, wanting to break up no matter what, kept on coming together ( no pun intended) and recording more music no matter what such as let it be, white album etc etc.
First of all, the 'Beatles' hadn't recorded togethet for nearly 10 years prior to JL getting shot. He did do some work with George and Ringo on separate projects but as a group no. In fact JL and Paul would never have worked together. One thing that tells me this is the song 'how do you sleep' (ya c*** as JL sang)
I do feel though and have for a while that the government was involved. Mark Chapeman has been up for parole many times but has been rejected 'aparently' on Jokos say. (No its not a typo...I said Joko
And he was still politically minded and active but not in such a public way as he had been.
Originally posted by q_ball
Also if im right, didnt the beatles sel the rights to their music to Michael Jackson? Was this after the death?
Originally posted by Fuggle
But the one point of contention I have with your post is your stating that "John was always traditionally considered the leader"...
Originally posted by q_ball
reply to post by prevenge
why?/How?
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
He was actually a better drummer then ringo was. He would write a lot of the parts and had to teach the others how to play them. So yea maybe he liked control but without it, they might not have been who they were...