The Space Elevator has always seemed to me the best solution to establishing a permanent connection to space, as the greatest challenge to space
exploration at this time is the cost involved in sending things through our atmosphere. I'm amazed at how little consideration this idea has received
from the mainstream media, and even mainstream science.
However, I'm not so sure about the Elevator as our best resource for this purpose, the more I think about it, the more difficulties seems to emerge,
there are so many variables that could destroy the tether:
It has to survive the spin of the earth, which is in and of itself quite a setback. Then it has to survive space debris, such as small meteorites
etc., and then it has to survive all the human debris floating about in low earth orbit. Never mind the complications in building the thing in the
first place.
I think some kind of anti-grav device may be our best bet... although that doesn't exist yet. Still, why is the mainstream, indeed why is NASA not
trying to curb its launch costs by researching alternative means of sending things up there!?

