It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by zero lift
The main danger in radioactive fall-out (and a full nuclear attack on the UK would produces enormous fall-out levels of gamma) is exposure to very high levels of high-energy gamma radiation.Please try and understand the following, its not hard - No NBC suit in the world can prevent this type of radiation. You need many feet of concrete, or earth, or steel to give adequate protection form gamma radiation.
Actually the graph provided earlier shows that you may need 'several feet' ( which means more than two) feet of concrete. Gamma radiation is a line of sight prompt weapon effect phenomenon so even those in direct line of sight shielded by modern building materials are likely to escape serious dosages and will be far more likely to be overcome by blast and thermal effects. Those that are further away without the benefit of buildings or such nearby will escape serious prompt radiation exposure by being in 2-3 meter deep fortified OPEN trenches given they are crouched and far enough away to escape the same old blast and thermal effects. Gamma radiation is not going to kill you if you have a meter or two worth of sand between you and explosion.
When I served in the Royal Observer Corps (part of the United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation) the maximum wartime dose of gamma radiation was 150 roentgens. UK Government peak estimates of the radiation rates expected in a global nuclear exchange were 20,000 roentgens per hour.
How can it be measured in per hour amounts when Gamma radiation does not persist and when blast effects are far more likely to kill those before the Gamma/neutron ever get the chance?...
...Why are you obsessed with Gamma fall-out? Of all the things you could worry about why have you chosen, presuming that you aren't just parroting the JIC nonsense, this ?
Iodine-131 is a beta and gamma emitter with a half-life of 8.07 days (specific activity 124,000 curies/g) Its decay energy is 970 KeV; usually divided between 606 KeV beta, 364 KeV gamma. Due to its short half-life it is most dangerous in the weeks immediately after the explosion, but hazardous amounts can persist for a few months. It constitutes some 2% of fission-produced isotopes - 1.6x10^5 curies/kt. Iodine is readily absorbed by the body and concentrated in one small gland, the thyroid.
Originally posted by zero lift
"
For nuclear weapons, the primary early danger from local fallout is due to gamma radiation.
Still reckon an NBC suit would protect you from gamma producing fallout?
zero lift
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by zero lift
"
For nuclear weapons, the primary early danger from local fallout is due to gamma radiation.
Still reckon an NBC suit would protect you from gamma producing fallout?
zero lift
Even when it's right in front of you you just can not accept it for what it is. Doesn't it clearly say primary EARLY danger from local fallout is due to gamma radiation? Where did i ever say that a NBC suit could protect you from prompt gamma radiation? Since those affects are very quickly dissipated your going to have to deal with PARTICLE fallout which IS something well maintained and cleaned NBC suits can deal with.
I mean it's not like i trust the NAS to relay the fact's when it's politically unacceptable but what more do you really want? Is it this hard for you to admit that highly intelligent people managed to fool you into thinking that defense and survival was impossible when it suited them to have you believe otherwise? It's this type of ignorant arrogance that allows those who have control to keep it; i mean who can fool someone as smart as you?
bah.
Stellar
[edit on 16-10-2008 by StellarX]
Originally posted by zero lift
Now you're just embarassing yourself StellarX. You've mis-read the quote!
Try re-reading my post, or better still go to the National Academy Press website and view the full report - you might get a better understanding of nuclear weapons fallout.
Mind you, the word 'fallout' should have given you a clue.
Its pretty straightforward - the NAS statement "Primary early danger from local fallout is due to gamma radiation." is not a reference to the initial prompt gamma ray burst.
It is a reference to the fact that the primary early danger is the deposition of local fallout, which contains gamma-emitting particles (also known as first-fallout)
Particles which no NBC suit can give protection from, however clean.
StellarX, you really need to understand that fallout contains large amounts of gamma emitting particles. Do a bit more research; you'll get there eventually.
Originally posted by Unknown Perpetrator
NBC suit means you just don't ingest or breath in any radiocontamination or get it on your skin.
They don't stop radiation or neutron streams, they just offer a barrier to stop you coming into actual contant with fallout particles
But you can't live in a NBC suit for weeks, months or years wearing a gas mask. You have to eat and drink too
"What kind of contamination is in fallout?
Fallout typically contains hundreds of different radionuclides. Some of these persist in the environment for a long time because they have relatively long half-lives. Some have very short half-lives and persist in the environment for only a few minutes or a few years. Some produce high levels of radiation. Both long-lived and highly radioactive materials pose potential human health and environmental risks.
Some of the more important radionuclides detected by EPA's RadNet include:
americium-241
cesium-137
iodine-131
strontium-90"
Cesium-137 undergoes radioactive decay with the emission of beta particles and relatively strong gamma radiation. Cesium-137 decays to barium-137m, a short-lived decay product, which in turn decays to a nonradioactive form of barium. The major dose from cesium-137 is from the barium-137. The half-life of cesium-137 is 30.17 years. Because of the chemical nature of cesium, it moves easily through the environment. This makes the cleanup of cesium-137 difficult.
Originally posted by Unknown Perpetrator
Question, is it not obvious that the enemy would attack the US strategic reserves with a ground burst?
Although some of these salt caverns are 1000m below ground, a dirty ground penetrator would render the crude oil supplies useless not to mention the close by refineries being destroyed ??
Does anybody know how much refined product the US military has in stock at any one time and how dispersed it is?
If sizable military reserves are stored on bases then surely they will destroyed too?
Originally posted by Unknown Perpetrator
Wrong? I don't think so. I'm countering the poisiton of some idiots round here that think we can pop out of underground bunkers after 30 days and start planting potatos and growing cucumbers to feed ourselves and then build new power grids and so on like nothing ever happened.
Yes, fireballs and overpressure will kill billions, nobody is arguing that
but any attempts to 'start again' will be hampered by mid/long term cancer effects, mutation of the next gererations and crop failures due to environemental damage.
The people that underestimate the potential of nuclear war do poo--poo the power of the bombs themselves
but the real gotcha is the frailty of our transport, agriculture, economic, water, technological and medical systems. This is the achilis heel of or current predicament.
Your average Russian is more likely to have a better stab at starting over given the hardships they've encountered pre/post communism in fending for themselves, growing their own food , repairing broken old systems etc.
Your overweight American couch potato who lards about in sweat pants and drives around in a 6 liter SUV couldn't put a spade in the ground and thinks a courgette is a sports car!
Electric car enthusiasts scoff at the affordability arguments. They point out that at the same time the EV1 was dropped, GM was busy promoting the most expensive and biggest gas guzzler of them all - the Hummer.
DAVE BARTHMUSS: I know that there are charges that we killed the electric vehicle program in order to create the Hummer, or be able to afford and pursue the Hummer program. Again, there is no conspiracy to cut off the electric vehicle because we wanted to pursue heavier and larger vehicles. People did not demand the EV1 from GM in large enough numbers, for us to pursue it.
CHRIS PAYNE: The Hummer was the ultimate SUV. And in fact, when it came out, you could get up to a $100,000 tax deduction if you were a small business owner for owning one. So the government gave a message to the people. The message was - buy these huge monstrosities. Meanwhile, the electric car, when they were on the road, the maximum tax credit you could get was $4,000. So this is how government shapes the future, and unfortunately the American Government was pushing Hummers and no wonder in some ways the car companies walked away from the EVs and concentrated on these Hummers.
news.sbs.com.au...
I think the Nuclear weapons detractors watch too much Jericho!
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by zero lift
americium is an alpha emmitter and also can be found in smoke alarms (and is also a propposed engine fuel and its a silver/white metal) , iodine and strontium are both beta emitters
i too can make a list - and just put on it each of a certain class of emitter - doesn`t mean a thing.
edit: to me alpha and beta radiaition is far more damaging , as they move far more slowly and thus have more `time` to cause destruction than gamma - a strong enough gamma source isn`t stopped by anything
delta radiation scares the bejesus out of me more than gamma ever does.
[edit on 17/10/08 by Harlequin]
Originally posted by zero lift
The US EPA good enough for you?
"What kind of contamination is in fallout?
Fallout typically contains hundreds of different radionuclides. Some of these persist in the environment for a long time because they have relatively long half-lives. Some have very short half-lives and persist in the environment for only a few minutes or a few years.
Some produce high levels of radiation. Both long-lived and highly radioactive materials pose potential human health and environmental risks.
Cesium-137 undergoes radioactive decay with the emission of beta particles and relatively strong gamma radiation.
Cesium-137 decays to barium-137m, a short-lived decay product, which in turn decays to a nonradioactive form of barium. The major dose from cesium-137 is from the barium-137. The half-life of cesium-137 is 30.17 years. Because of the chemical nature of cesium, it moves easily through the environment. This makes the cleanup of cesium-137 difficult.
www.epa.gov...
Caesium-137 (also spelled cesium) is a radioactive isotope of Caesium which is formed mainly by nuclear fission. It has a half-life of 30.23 years, and decays by pure beta decay to a metastable nuclear isomer of barium-137 (Ba-137m). Barium-137m has a half-life of 2.55 minutes and is responsible for all of the gamma ray emission. The ground state of barium-137 is stable.
Caesium-137 is water-soluble and extremely toxic in minute amounts. Once released into the environment, it remains present for many years as its radiological half-life is 30.23 years. It can cause cancer 10, 20 or 30 years from the time of ingestion, inhalation or absorption provided sufficient material enters the body. [1]
en.wikipedia.org...
As Unknown Perpetrator quite rightly pointed out:
"It [cesium 137] is the primary long-term gamma emitter hazard from fallout, and remains a hazard for centuries
Originally posted by zero lift
My point harlequin, was to demonstrate that, for whatever reason (and contrary to StellarX's constant assertions), fallout particles do emit gamma radiation (e.g. the decay of cesium137).
The danger presented by this gamma radiation obviously prevents search and rescue measures to be conducted for at least two weeks, as any would be rescuer would rapidly exceed the recommended wartime emergency dose (75 roentgens, although some earlier ROC briefings had used a figure of 150 roentgens).
By the time it would be safe to start search and rescue, anyone needing rescuing would have already received a fatal dose of radiation thus negating the need for a S&R service.
Thats why the UK Civil Defence S&R Corps were disbanded, along with the WRVS emergency kitchens, mobile police columns, etc.;
not for some uncaring reason or to save money, but for the simple fact that the coverage of the UK by radioactive fallout would prevent S&R efforts and subsequent evacuation