Hillary Clinton Facing Serious Fraud Charges

Hillary Clinton Facing Serious Fraud Charges

www.lasuperiorcourt.org

Case Summary




Please make a note of the Case Number.

Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

Case Number: BC304174
PETER F PAUL VS WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
Filing Date: 10/14/2003
Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
04/25/2008 at 08:31 am in department 47 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Further Status Conference



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties

CLINTON HILLARY RODHAM - Defendant/Respondent

CLINTON WILLIAM JEFFERSON - Defendant/Respondent

D. COLETTE WILSON ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

DOYEN MICHAEL R. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON FOR U.S. SENATE - Defendant/Respondent

KREEP GARY G. - Former Attorney for Pltf/Petn

LEVIN JAMES - Defendant/Respondent

MACHTINGER LEONARD A. - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

NORMAN JAN B. - Associated Counsel

NORRIS STERLING E. ESQ. - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

PAUL PETER F. - Plaintiff/Petitioner

ROSEN DAVID - Defendant/Respondent

SMITH GARY - Defendant/Respondent

TONKEN AARON - Defendant/Respondent

WILLAMS & CONNOLLY - Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit on 19-4-2008 by Blue_Jay33]

I put this here because this is a huge story and the media isn't covering it.

www.lasuperiorcourt.org
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 19-4-2008 by Blue_Jay33]

The site requires registering to view the case. For those who don't want to expand their online presence any further then they already have, could you give a brief summary of the charges?

reply to post by TLomon


Bah, they just screwed up the timeline. You wait until they are elected before bringing out this tripe so that it deflects from real issues, like the economy. Better a presidential scandal than talking about a recession. Works for the PTB everytime.

Monica endorses this post.

*Not really*

See these vids

www.youtube.com...
&
www.youtube.com...

Thats what this case is all about.

[edit on 19-4-2008 by Blue_Jay33]

Who rich has not fiddled there tax. What about obama and those house sales?

They are all cons, just accept that. Thats why they do not cover it.

It will be reported now I just emailed every MSM organization asking why they are not printing this story...it will be interesting to see if it comes up...

Actually I believe that no one is covering this because it's old news and already been covered.


It was reported in places like the Washington Post and Times magazine. Oh and 20/20 even. Years ago.

I thought too that much of this had been dismissed, what, way back in 2002?

www.metnews.com...

Yeah considering "Filing Date: 10/14/2003 " Was close to 5 years ago .

Got any updated news on this tho ? I'm interested.

reply to post by d11_m_na_c05


Maybe we will find out in 6 days. Considering this quoted from the op.

"FUTURE HEARINGS
04/25/2008 at 08:31 am in department 47 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012"

Maybe someone can get some reporters over there?


[edit on 19-4-2008 by schism85]

Right the new court date is set for 4/25/08 so it may of been filed then but the fun stuff is coming now.

reply to post by mybigunit


Ahhh good call sorry i didn't notice .

I have nothing else to say on the subject at this time.

So I have a bet with my mother who swears by main stream media (yea, horrible, i know) that if anything against Hillary Clinton this big was to be known about, it would have been reported by FOX/CNN/Any MSM source long before it showed up on this forum. Obviously she knows nothing about ATS, but my question is.

She wants to bet me 500$ that this is false, and that Hillary Clinton is not involved in any fraud because the MSM diddnt report on it yet.

Should I take the bet?

hmmm- this makes me wonder- back when billary was president didn't she get investigated for insider trading on i think it was cattle futures? i might have dreamed it but for some reason it is stuck in my head

Originally posted by deadline527
So I have a bet with my mother who swears by main stream media (yea, horrible, i know) that if anything against Hillary Clinton this big was to be known about, it would have been reported by FOX/CNN/Any MSM source long before it showed up on this forum. Obviously she knows nothing about ATS, but my question is.

She wants to bet me 500$ that this is false, and that Hillary Clinton is not involved in any fraud because the MSM diddnt report on it yet.

Should I take the bet?

The link to this web site wins you the bet doesn't it?

Originally posted by Blue_Jay33

Originally posted by deadline527
So I have a bet with my mother who swears by main stream media (yea, horrible, i know) that if anything against Hillary Clinton this big was to be known about, it would have been reported by FOX/CNN/Any MSM source long before it showed up on this forum. Obviously she knows nothing about ATS, but my question is.

She wants to bet me 500$ that this is false, and that Hillary Clinton is not involved in any fraud because the MSM diddnt report on it yet.

Should I take the bet?

The link to this web site wins you the bet doesn't it?

I wish it did, lol. I am just waiting for the court date to appear because unless its reported by FOX news, I swear she dosent believe it. And sadly, this is how most of the people I know go about things. Is it any wonder our country is so blatently clueless as to anything that goes on around them?

I sent an email to CNN, MSNBC, Fox NEws, and NYT and havent got a response to any of them on if they are going to report this and why arent they...I dont know but there must be a reason why they arent reporting it.