It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Colonel
Uh, maybe the Colonel might be right...AGAIN?????
Originally posted by McGotti
They are all going to hell for making that movie..I think thats fairly obvious.
[Edited on 26-2-2004 by McGotti]
Originally posted by porschedrifter
Actor Jim Caviezel has been struck by lightning while playing Jesus in Mel Gibson's controversial film The Passion Of Christ. The lightning bolt hit Caviezel and the film's assistant director Jan Michelini while they were filming in a remote location a few hours from Rome.
It was the second time Michelini had been hit by lightning during the shoot.
Coincidence? The actors initials are JC, and the assistant director was hit twice on TWO separate occasions. Remember.... lightning never hits the same place twice
Also a woman had a stroke while watching the crusification scene in the theaters today, later passed away at the hospital.
news.bbc.co.uk...
www.religionnewsblog.com...
www.in-sourced.com...
edition.cnn.com...
Is there more to this movie than it seems?
[Edited on 26-2-2004 by porschedrifter]
I dont think being hit by lightning is a divine message, but getting hit twice, and living, is....................
Carry on..........
Originally posted by Guerilla
I have gone through my life seeing all kinds of differant Jesus(pbuh) movies and all seemed great at the time, because i was a Catholic and i never questioned!
But now that i have reverted to Islam, i know now why it is bad to potray the image of any Prophet(peace be upon the all) of God, it is because it draws worship from the One True God.
Originally posted by RANT
Why the hell wasn't THIS on the news? I've seen hundreds if not thousands of hours on this crap and this is the first I've heard of this.
"Caviezel was uninjured, but a producer described how he saw smoke coming from the actor's ear."
This amazes me. Fans of this movie think every little thing written down 2000 years ago is a freaking miracle, but THIS is no big deal. Hello?
If this happened during a play of the life of Jesus 1900 years ago, there'd be a Catholic ban on the portrayal of Jesus and a whole freaking book in the NT on the miracle of God's message through a lightening bolt.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Ahh...that's what you get for watching mainstream, hehe..... We discussed BOTH incidents ages ago, hehe.....
Originally posted by RANT
Originally posted by Gazrok
Ahh...that's what you get for watching mainstream, hehe..... We discussed BOTH incidents ages ago, hehe.....
I guess I need to look it up then. My point is that had this been a movie about why Jesus is not divine (some historical skeptical epic) then getting hit by lightening would "PROVE" that God exists and the movie shouldn't be made.
But the reverse is easily ignored by fans. Why? It's hypcritical. I don't put much stock in any of it, but if I were some devout scripture and miracles junkie I'd think twice about worshipping at the false alter of this movie. Or wearing a cross for that matter. Graven image and all that.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Actually, I've got 3 separate lightning incidents myself, so this guy's still gotta catch up, hehe....