Those assertions all seem way too over the top for me. I can get behind the idea of the CIA supporting the drug trade in South America.
I can't get behind the President of the United States taking a top general to go and personally check out a drug factory. There is just no way that
a president would risk being seen at such a place. How many thousands of people below him could he have go and get a detailed report, leaving him
with no accountability?
I can't get behind a PotUS personally taking delivery of cocaine. I wouldn't be shocked to find out that Clinton used it in office (i doubt it
though), but again... why take delivery yourself? How many other trusted people could he use to get it for him? It is just insane.
I wouldn't be surprised if BushCo wanted Perot dead, but to personally call in a hit on him is a bit absurd.
It will take some serious convincing for me to believe what this guy says.

