posted on Feb, 2 2008 @ 12:34 PM
On Sepember 11th 2001 4 airliners were allegedly used as missiles in 3 terrorist attacks and one failed terrorist attack. These airliners, to my
knowledge, were never identified by serial number. This sets precedent, if I am not mistaken.
Secondly, the lack of physical evidence is one of the most quoted aspects in debate, where the 'truthers' quote lack of evidence frequently and the
rebutal usually points to a small amount (in terms of mass) of evidence that certainly implies airliners.
This would imply that precedent in airliner collisions had been set 8 seperate times in one day. Well technically the precedent was only set once for
each instance and then chronlogicaly the following events had not. For each instance (lack of SN and lack of mass) to never happen and then all come
into play on the same day is a mathematical improbability that approaches impossibility.
The problem is that it is impossible to prove a negative, unless of course it is wrong (and therefore not a negative). In other words, we cant prove
something didnt happen. So, my question to everyone here is:
Can you disprove the precedents set on 911? Can you find other instances where anything happened to an airliner where over 95% of the mass was
destroyed on impact, or where not one serial number was found? Alternatively can you find any piece of 911 evidence from any of the 4 planes that
states serial numbers?