It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planted 9/11 evidence ~ How evil are the spooks?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2008 @ 03:02 AM
link   
Well I got a shock tonight with reading some information
I had not heard before concerning 9/11 evidence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First off some small stuff to start off:

Everybody remembers the Betty Ong (flight 11, flight attendant)
(alleged) telephone call to AA. In her entire conversation she never
mentions anything about anybody being handcuffed. Nor did the transcript
of the other Flight 11 flight attendant Madeline Sweeney produce
a statement of anyone being handcuffed on that flight.

Flight Attendant Robert Fangman (flight 175) also made an (alleged) call to
United briefly (which we have not heard a recording of that conversation)
which the details include "the flight had been hijacked, both pilots had been killed,
a flight attendant had been stabbed, and the hijackers were probably flying the plane."
The alleged call lasted about two minutes. He does not
state anything about anybody being handcuffed. If any of these people
were handcuffed it would be safe to assume that they couldn't hold a
phone to make a call or to speak.

Now comes the sick part:

There were a pair of human hands that were severed from the
arms that were handcuffed together and were found 9/12/01,
the day after the hijack. The hands were found atop a building
in Manhattan. Which building was not mentioned. The identity
turned out to an undisclosed flight attendant from either flight 11
or flight 175. They won't disclose the identity public (so they say).

That's not all: They also found another flight attendant's full body
with hands attached and handcuffed at ground zero. Location
is undisclosed as well as the identity undisclosed.

That makes 2 pairs of flight attendant's handcuffed hands which means
either the phone calls were faked or either the evidence was planted
at the scene by the spooks. If it was planted by spooks, then just
how evil are these people to go round dumping off body parts?

More:
We've all heard about the hijacker's passport found on the ground
at ground zero partially burned. Well here's a twist.
A Wells Fargo ATM Card in perfect condition was found 1 year
exactly (9/11/02) after 9/11. That card belonged to Waleed
Iskander and was returned by mail from the recovery team
at ground zero. Waleed was on flight 11. The first tower impact.
This was the plane that hit head on into the side of the building
unlike 175 that hit off to the side. Flight 11 was the plane that
smashed directly into the core of WTC1. With an ATM card escaping
all the inferno.

Also,
Capt. Jim Ingledue said two days after 9/11 he found the perfectly
unscathed ID of Susanne Calley, 42, one of the alleged passengers,
adding he thought the find "highly unusual and strange to find a perfectly
intact card amidst the devastation and rubble at the Pentagon."

more:
A withdrawal of a report created on 9/11/01 for the FAA stated that
at least one passenger on flight 11 (Daniel Lewin) was shot by
Satam Al Suqami with one shot. This statement was later retracted
and a subsequent report was filed with the FAA but that second report
has not been made available to the public. But Laura Brown, FAA
spokeswoman said in phone interview there was no gun. But the original
report is listed here.

My question is how did they come about the information about
someone being shot and killed in the first place since neither transcript
of contact with 2 flight attendants aboard flight 11, neither of them
mentions anybody was shot.

The only conversation with anybody on any of the flights where
they mention seeing a pilot outside of the cockpit was on flight 93.
Barbara Olsen's conversation with her husband she states that
the pilots were herded to the back of the plane with the passengers.

This was the only plane that didn't reach the designated target.
It was the only plane that that the pilots were left alive and
not reported to have been killed. Very interesting! Also nobody
on flight 93 reported any handcuffs either. Neither did anybody
from flight 77 that supposedly hit the Pentagon.

With such inconsistencies in the hijackers protocols. I wonder
why each flight was handled differently in the take-over details.

well I have rambled on long enough. Post your comments




posted on Jan, 20 2008 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Many salient points, however, reports that cannot be linked or verified, hidden evidence, must be taken with a grain of salt.

There was NO calls from Barbara Olson to Ted. None.The FBI testified in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui that there were TWO attempted calls, and only one went thru, for ZERO seconds. There were no calls, and Ted lied, or he was fooled by a voice morph. Pilots waiting around in the rear of the plane with the passengers..yeah, right.

As far as handcuffed hands, I would need to see more info before deciding the veracity of that claim. There were no indications of that at all: What did they do, smuggle a duffel bag of weapons onto each plane? ridiculous. Recall that most of the ' highjackers ' supposedly went thru extra security before boarding, and so how in the hell could all the handcuffs, and guns, and mace, etc. get there?

To believe that an airline employee could be handcuffed, be crashed into a Tower, go thru the fires and collapses, and still end up with hands in cuffes on top of a building nearby is too crazy. No way. The hands were probably those of someone in the Towers that was kept from exposing the plot or who had run afoul of the perps in a Tower..whatever. But no way could the official story even have a shred of truth in it.

The story given by the govt. is a total lie and complete fabrication from start to finish. What they cannot deny, they ignore.



posted on Jan, 21 2008 @ 06:49 AM
link   
I had never heard of handcuffs being used until now, it does seem that alot of the evidence was planted. It's far too convinient for the i.d's of the "hijackers" to be unharmed during the fire, explosion and collapse, let alone a pair of hands in cuffs!

This is just one more thing the U.S government will ignore or make out to be lies just like they do every day!

Good find and post, flag and star!



posted on Jan, 21 2008 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by eyewitness86
Many salient points, however, reports that cannot be linked or verified, hidden evidence, must be taken with a grain of salt.


Snopes has verified the handcuff story as real. Though I don't think they list their
sources for the info. But doesn't everyone go to Snopes to find out
if a story is real or not? Their credentials in the past have been
astounding with the data they release. So I don't think the
handcuff story was fabricated.



posted on Jan, 21 2008 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by eyewitness86
so how in the hell could all the handcuffs, and guns, and mace, etc. get there?

well I don't know about the gun part, but the cuffs and mace can be
explained.

The airlines carries "flex-cuffs" onboard the plane in cases where
a passenger needs to be restrained. So the cuffs were already on board.
They just knew where they were kept or had a stewardess get them
for them while being assaulted.

As far as the mace, a simple visit to the lavatory where 2 or more
substances could have been mixed from carry-on items and
disseminated after mixing is possible. Ever wonder why new airport
security pays close attention to liquids going on an airliner these
days. Maybe that's where the mace came from. It may not have
been mace at all. It may have just been an eye irritant which simulated
mace. Plenty of items at Wal-Mart could do that. A bomb could also
have been mixed from liquids and solids in a lavatory as well.

So it is possible, haven't you ever seen McGyver ???



new topics

top topics
 
2

log in

join