It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hispanic Employee of Ron Paul's, Answers Racism rumours

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2008 @ 09:01 PM
link   
This man, Worked for Dr. Paul.
Provides insight on himself, Dr. Paul, and these rumors that Old Media keeps repeating, as if they were true.

Here is a snippet for those afraid to click-it.




There is now underway a full-blown smear campaign to paint Ron Paul as a racist. First, there was the lame attempt at guilt by association, with a mere campaign contribution by some red neck racist being touted as “proof” that Ron Paul is racist. And then there were equally stupid Kevin Baconesque degrees of separation attempts to connect Ron with various so-called “hate groups.”


stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com...

[edit on 11-1-2008 by spacedoubt]




posted on Jan, 11 2008 @ 09:54 PM
link   
I posted this on another thread 46 minutes after this thread started and apparently never saw this thread. Anyways, I'm glad that somebody who worked for him is standing up to him. If this guy can bring hard evidence that he worked for Paul and get more attention (specially from the media), this it could go a long way into showing that he really didn't write the newsletter.



posted on Jan, 12 2008 @ 02:28 PM
link   
Paul has answered this on CNN (again).
Now he has people who knew him then, backing him up.

The interesting part is that he is the ONLY candidate who is interested in Protecting Civil liberties. ALL the others, Dems and the rest of the Republicans
are only interested in divisive programs.

What a crock. This issue was dead when it was brought up.
So I guess it's still dead..



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 01:10 AM
link   
reply to post by spacedoubt
 


No. He's interested in moving the power to strip civil liberties from the federal government to the state government. That's a far cry from "Defending civil liberties", and you know it.



posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 11:46 PM
link   
reply to post by The Walking Fox
 


And that's why states have their own constitutions...to define the state powers just as the U.S. Constitution defines the powers of the federal government. Just because powers not specifically relegated to the Fed. govt need to be returned to the states doesn't mean the states will take advantage of their "new found powers" and trample the rights of it's citizens. They would find that a lot harder to get away with than what is happening on a federal level now.



posted on Jan, 14 2008 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by ElectRon41
 


Exactly, because the people have more power to affect policy at the state level.

What is so hard to get about that?



new topics

top topics
 
3

log in

join