posted on Dec, 20 2007 @ 11:08 AM
reply to post by Rasobasi420
No absolutely not, I just like to compound knowledge, I think the conversations should grow not digress....for instance below your post, that I
am responding to now it shows a reply to a post saying something like
"Does anyone now see the idiocy of the term Islamofacism"
And the response is:
"The term fits Radical Islam Perfect"
The term itself has a specific purpose, as one analyst to another can say IslamoFacist group and know what we are talking about in general. In other
words you could see the analyst or planner constantly having to define what was meant to another so the term can be debated as idiotic, but in
relevant professions this term coins certain groups, and when the term is used the defintion has a specific application. As opposed to the reply "The
term fits radical Islam perfect" no it does not. If someone would have actually read the POSTS here they would know just because someone is a
fundamentalist does not mean they are radical, and just because someone is a radical does not make them an Islamofacist, which I guess could speak of
an individuals ideology but for the most part is used to coin certain groups.
I apologize if it seems I am being pushy about my opinion, which in this case is not really my opinion but based on my professional knowledge. It
seems people just ignore what is said to stream nonsensical arguements, or perhaps they do not read all the POST before jumping in (which is their
right) the way I see it is like I see an exposed politician. They are either fabricating because they know and choose to ignore, or they should of
known and acted based on incompetence. To see people here at a forum that is to search out facts, relay Theory, discuss in a intelligent manner
(happens most of the time), and be honest, I think there is a lot of undermining and agenda that chooses to ignore and yes that is somewhat upsetting