Dealing with 9/11 Madness (argumentum ad hominem veritas), page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 100 times


reply posted on 12-12-2007 @ 11:35 PM by SimiusDei
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT



My wi-fi is being VERY sketchy. I'll take a look tomorrow and offer my 2 pennies okay amigo?





Jasn



reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 11:03 AM by Majic
He Got Game

Originally posted by infinityoreilly
Also I've noticed an NBA style application of the "rules" here at ATS, meaning those with long histories here are given a longer leash when it comes to infractions.

Enforcement of the
T&C is indeed discretionary and may seem uneven to the casual observer.

However, though individual styles vary, there is a rationale behind all staff action.

New members usually get some slack because they may honestly not know they're doing something wrong. We try to bring them up to speed as painlessly as possible, and most folks respond favorably to that approach.

New members who start off spouting obscenities, posting spam and picking fights with mods, on the other hand, usually don't last more than a few days or weeks at the most.

Established members who have a track record of contributing good posts also get some slack. We all have bad days now and then, and if an otherwise good member has a Maalox moment now and then, we usually try to resolve the situation as peacefully as we can.

Then there are members who intentionally test the limits and try to get away with things to see if we're watching. They're less interested in discussing the topics than stirring up drama, care more about scoring points than denying ignorance and are always the first to throw tantrums over any perceived sleight.

And they waste an inordinate amount of staff time.

After a dubious career of racking up fouls and arguing with the refs, they are eventually expelled from the game.

It all comes down to respect for the sport.


reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 01:29 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
Originally posted by SimiusDei
reply to
post by Craig Ranke CIT



My wi-fi is being VERY sketchy. I'll take a look tomorrow and offer my 2 pennies okay amigo?



Si senior.

Gracias.


reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 02:34 PM by behindthescenes
Perhaps we should clarify something here that I think Bill and the rest of ATS staff is trying to make clear in personal attacks.

Bill, please correct me if I'm wrong, but the gestation of this ruling has come due to personal attacks from one poster to another. In short, one person expresses and opinion or personal theory and another poster attempts to shoot that person down by calling him/her an idiot, or liberal, or stupid or something base along those lines.

I never got the impression that we, as contributors, are supposed to curtail our assessment of public figures or personalities who figure prominently into the conspiracy mythos, as one poster seems to fear may be happening. Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I would think that ATS could safely rely upon the long-standing law established by the Supreme Court that public figures have extremely limited access to recourse from slander/defamation. And they have absolutely no recourse from criticism, as is healthy in a democracy.

I think the application of these harsher penalities will, in the end, filter out those who simply troll on the 9/11 forum or have no real imput into a debate other than to call another poster names.

Where I think ATS needs to tred a fine line and be careful not to become overbearing is in the criticisms of those public personalities who are members and contributors to this site. While most members treat such celebrities with the upmost respect, they at times profess or say something to their belief that leaves them open to examination or criticism. Be careful not to simply shoot the messanger.


reply posted on 13-12-2007 @ 03:05 PM by Griff
reply to post by Majic




I came close but stuck with it. Now it should be better.


As long as this is applied to everyone and not hand picked individuals that is.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies