It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Andre, correct me if I've misunderstood your argument, but are you arguing that if guns were outlawed everything would be peaceful because nobody would have guns?
Because if that's the case, it simply amazes me that you think the criminals would actually give up their guns.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Andre, correct me if I've misunderstood your argument, but are you arguing that if guns were outlawed everything would be peaceful because nobody would have guns?
Because if that's the case, it simply amazes me that you think the criminals would actually give up their guns.
Law abiding citizens would all disarm, while the people who are actually dangerous would keep their guns and use them on the unarmed public. This is what makes them criminals, they don't do what the law says.
Marijuana is illegal also. Look how much of that there is.
Originally posted by jtma508
Originally posted by dave420Now if we're talking about the ol' "what's to stop King George stealing my waffles etc. etc." argument, well, the armed forces are there for that. And if it's the "stop a corrupt government" argument, well, again - the armed forces will definitely help with that (they've taken an oath for just that purpose).
If only this were true. George Bush and Dick Cheney took the very same oath. That hasn't stopped them from running rough-shod over The Constitution. We can only hope that the military remain true to 'The People' should that time come. IMO, the military might be convinced to round us all up, detain us, take our property, etc. but far less likely to shoot us. And that would only become necessary if we resisted.