posted on Dec, 11 2007 @ 04:54 PM
What this seems to be is a report that the person filing it wanted to squash, and chose any "explanation" handy as the one to do it.
There is no data to suggest that this was a cover up, and may have well been a case where the report was by someone considered unreliable. It could be
a case where the investigation was deemed unprofitable because the witness was subsequently in some trouble legally, or a thousand mundane reasons,
right down to, but not excluding, laziness on the part of those looking into the matter.
It is worth noting that a very similar report was filed almost exactly a year before from the same area.