It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
The government is involved in that it regulates HMO's, but it's private currently. It would actually cost less to have a universal single payer system, as compared to what people are paying for healthcare now...
Most if not all countries with universal healthcare have longer lifespans than Americans do...
Originally posted by The Cyfre
That's kind of a wild statement to make, and i'd like to see you back that up with a source. Nothing personal. I just don't believe you.
U.S. Life Span Shorter
Saturday August 11, 2007 8:01 PM
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Americans are living longer than ever, but not as long as people in 41 other countries.
For decades, the United States has been slipping in international rankings of life expectancy, as other countries improve health care, nutrition and lifestyles.
Countries that surpass the U.S. include Japan and most of Europe, as well as Jordan, Guam and the Cayman Islands.
``Something's wrong here when one of the richest countries in the world, the one that spends the most on health care, is not able to keep up with other countries,'' said Dr. Christopher Murray, head of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.
A baby born in the United States in 2004 will live an average of 77.9 years. That life expectancy ranks 42nd, down from 11th two decades earlier, according to international numbers provided by the Census Bureau and domestic numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics.
Andorra, a tiny country in the Pyrenees mountains between France and Spain, had the longest life expectancy, at 83.5 years, according to the Census Bureau. It was followed by Japan, Maucau, San Marino and Singapore.
The shortest life expectancies were clustered in Sub-Saharan Africa, a region that has been hit hard by an epidemic of HIV and AIDS, as well as famine and civil strife. Swaziland has the shortest, at 34.1 years, followed by Zambia, Angola, Liberia and Zimbabwe.
Researchers said several factors have contributed to the United States falling behind other industrialized nations. A major one is that 45 million Americans lack health insurance, while Canada and many European countries have universal health care, they say.
But ``it's not as simple as saying we don't have national health insurance,'' said Sam Harper, an epidemiologist at McGill University in Montreal. ``It's not that easy.''
Originally posted by grimreaper797
If there is a government out there that fits your views more than this one, maybe you should head over to it. Here, in the US, we have a different kind of government. We don't want a nanny state, nor do we want any group of people trying to turn it into one. Ron Paul stands for this desire to ward off the people who want to transform this nation into one of those nanny states.
If you want universal healthcare and such to so bad, there are many european countries that have it. I don't see why it is necessary to stay here and force a faulty system on people who don't want it, and know that isn't what their government was created for. If you want a government that will take care of you, protect you, and general treat you like a 5 year old, then the land of the free and the home of the brave might not be for you.
Personally, I'm voting Ron Paul, because I'm an adult, and would like the government to treat me like one.
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
The government is involved in that it regulates HMO's, but it's private currently. It would actually cost less to have a universal single payer system, as compared to what people are paying for healthcare now...
Actually, Insurance is regulated by each State.
The reason health care is so expensive is that 1)no one knows how much it costs anymore...insurance pays for it so they don't care, 2) Lawyers, 3) unnecessary tests and procedures (because of lawyers), 4) freeloaders
Researchers said several factors have contributed to the United States falling behind other industrialized nations. A major one is that 45 million Americans lack health insurance, while Canada and many European countries have universal health care, they say.
But ``it's not as simple as saying we don't have national health insurance,'' said Sam Harper, an epidemiologist at McGill University in Montreal. ``It's not that easy.''
Adults in the United States have one of the highest obesity rates in the world. Nearly a third of U.S. adults 20 years and older are obese, while about two-thirds are overweight, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.
To get back on topic, Ron Paul actually supports free trade and privatization of health care. In other situations this has been proven to actually reduce costs and increase competition. This leads to more advancements in medicine and more availability, especially if you're not paying an arm and a leg so some obese house wife can get her prescription diet pills.
Please, please wake up.
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
Nanny state? Look at a country like the Netherlands, smoking pot, and prostitution are legal... I'm against a nanny state. Ron Paul is beholden to the religious right from what I've seen of him...
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
Nice utopian idea... I'd rather go with a tested system like single payer universal health care (Germany has it now, and I think Canada, but I might be wrong)....
Originally posted by The Cyfre
There is nothing utopian about a free market health care system. Listen, we're both looking for change in the health care system. My wife worked for a Dr. for the last six years, and their end-of-year bonuses depended 100% on how much money they saved. This meant that if an 80 year old woman needed an MRI, she likely wasn't getting one because she was going to die soon anyway. This is completely wrong and unacceptable. They don't want to spend money on patients because then they don't get to put as much of that money in their own pockets. Her entire day revolved around how much service they could with-hold without looking like they were being negligent. She couldn't take any more and had to quit because her ethics weren't in line with it all.
I'm simply not interested in being taxed for something i don't want. I'm not interested in being forced to have health care. I wouldn't be opposed to having health care as an option, but NOT mandatory, and i don't want to be paying for it if i'm not using it.
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
Oh really stuff like this goes on in the great U S of A, I thought it only happened in 'socialized medicine'...
Btw, where in the world is the free market health program you think is great? And if it would work so well why aren't more countries doing it?
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
I'm not sure how many people are in your company. You're already taxed for plenty of things that you have no option on like road construction, police, fire, state and federal bureacracy, national defense, social welfare, and a great deal more. Health care seems like a good thing for government to do especially considering IMO it 's working in nearly every other industrialized country...
Originally posted by Raoul Duke
Nice utopian idea... I'd rather go with a tested system like single payer universal health care (Germany has it now, and I think Canada, but I might be wrong)....