Too much info can be bad

How do we pass on all the learned info onto the next generation? will they even care? Over time, we have forgotten many things that were important in the past. NO past info is obsolete, but there is some info that should never be forgotten. We need a permanent libary with all our learned skills and technology.
Soon it will be too much, and we will be over run with people who have too much in their head and can't controll themselves with new info. thats sad if you ask me. Forget the NWO, and wory about how the next generation is forgetting all that we learned.

There is a method of thought from those that think they are superior. They say one must come to the knowledge by themselves and can not just be taught it. Here is that knowledge. They believe we are too stupid and must be ruled and lied to.

They wait till a person realizes that the common people are not able to understand how things work. But the truth is that only makes sense if they think that they, the elite, are correct. Using Cheney as an example this is what I see happening. Cheney says we must sometimes turn to the dark side, he lines up facts projections and great intellectuals to see that violence in Iraq is the only choice for American policy. Then when commoners say no violence, he just says they are to dumb to understand, when it is possible they just have different values. Cheney's facts come from what he thinks is important, cold science and profit and comfort for those he believes deserves it. The commoner believes in justice and not hurting others just to get a few comforts. So the commoner uses love and what is right, something Cheney does not understand. So he only sees them as dumb and unworthy of all the hidden secret knowledge.

Now Cheney has a problem, he can't say what he is really doing, from his perspective people are to dumb to understand, from the peoples perspective it is evil. So they must make the people dumber, distracted and keep secrets. Now he is not only doing something evil, he is also attacking those that are good by using disinformation and even drugging the population and allowing lead lined items to brain damage children for years.

So why do they say a person must realize the truth for themselves? Because unless a person turns to there way of thinking, they do not believe they have reached the point where they have realized the truth. If a person does embrace darkness then the elite say, wow he has figured it out and now is worthy of secrets.

You see how there perspective defends their own evil, and only accepts others that are evil. This is why many politicians are attacked by media, do not get to hear everything, and do not make it on ballots. It is also why they use "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" Linked in signature.

If this gets you angry, then be aware the second thing they say is we are evil. We don't want to use anger the wrong way and justify that false claim they make. Actually we are only evil, if you believe, as they do, that they deserve 99% of the wealth and prosperity in society. If you say, hey the children should have health care, and it means they don't get a second yacht, then they think you are evil. So is a person that believes in moderation, or justice and prosperity evil or good. Again I see there perspective backing up there agenda, not reality and truth.


[edit on 9-11-2007 by Redge777]