It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nathraq
(ever been on I94 going through downtown Detroit?)
Originally posted by worldwatcher
Nathraq, well said. It is totally true and probably one of the hardest things to change. Now I wouldn't be as extreme to totally cut aid at once to all those we help. But I definitely would not be fighting wars on other lands. So how do we change this?
We need to speak up in a collective voice, write letters to so-called representatives and most important, we need to vote!! no excuses whatsoever. I don't want to hear anyone's whining about votes not counting, and electoral this and electoral that. Just vote. and NOT just the big elections, vote from the lowest level land perhaps then this country will have a chance to change.
Originally posted by THENEO
But America is home of many of the world's largest corporations which make billions doing business around the world. Much of that money goes home to the US to be paid out as dividends and to pay head office salaries. The US cannot maintain its present standard of living by just looking inward any more than England could have during the Industrial Revolution.
Originally posted by nathraq
I didn't mean becoming an isolationist. That would be absurd. But the money used for this little 'skirmish' in Iraq could have probably fixed our welfare system. The funds used for waging war are federal funds.
Businesses are privately owned ventures. We would sure be hurting economically if they pulled out of the world market. They are not the primary source of funding for schools, highways, and social services.
Originally posted by NotTooHappy
I think every time the government starts a new war their children should be the first ones on the front line. I think that, that would help make soldiers lives less disposable.
[Edited on 1/30/04 by NotTooHappy]
Surfup, let me put this in the simplest terms possible, it should eliminate any more arguments about this.
Let's say every one this planet were your blood relatives, you have contact with them all. Now a suddenly alot of them are feeling hard times. Wouldn't you start helping your family by helping the ones closest to you first? Once they relatives closest to you are well, they can in turn then help those closer to them...the chain goes on. But in order for the chain to be strong, you have to start in point A, make point B strong before you move to point C.
follow my drift?
Let's say every one this planet were your blood relatives,