Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming 'Greatest Scam in History', page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 8-11-2007 @ 07:43 AM by traderonwallst

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming 'Greatest Scam in History'


newsbusters.org
It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
icecap.us

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Al Gore is wrong on global warming
Global Warming Theory takes a hit!

[edit on 8/11/2007 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 09:46 AM by traderonwallst
reply to post by nyk537



Nicely put NYK. If people just realized how true my signature statement is, the world would be a much easier place to live. know your history, live in the present, know your future. Everything comes around over and over again. Cycles. Cycles. Cycles. The earth heats, the earth cools, the earth heats, the earth cools. Stocks go up, stocks go down, stocks go up, stocks go down. I made a living off noticing trends in the stock market. Buy high, sell low....the trend is your friend, trade the trend.

Cabbage patch kids, a huge success story in the late 70's. Brought back in the early 90's. Rubix Cube, huge success story in the late 70's, early 80's. Back again this year. My daughter is 9, she got a rubix cube from a friend for a birthday. She thought it was awesome, all her friends have them. SHE COULD NOT BELIEVE I KNEW WHAT IT WAS. I told her I had one when i was her age, she was shocked.

Everything goes in cycles. The housing cyclce. Whole economies. Nature works in cycles. The tides are an example of cycles, the moon coming and going, another cycle.

No one seems to disagree that global warming has happened before, and everyone seems to agree it will happen again. But what everyone does seem to be arguing is how fast the current rise in temps are going up. Honestly its the prediction of the rise that you are arguing, and that gets adjusted (corrected) every year. Who is to say that such a pace never did occur at another time in our history? Do you have the data to say it never did???? Again, as I have said before, the burden of proving your theory falls on you, not on us to disprove it. We will gladly disprove your theory once yours is proven and ACCEPTED AS SCIENCE. You can't disprove something that is updated and adjusted daily to meet your end goal.


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 10:00 AM by traderonwallst
reply to post by Alphard




Nothing is wrong with protecting the earth. Just don't tell me how to live my life, force laws down my throat and take my taxes to clean something up I did not do.

I am sick and tired of having the fear of global warming shoved down my throat. Maybe we should move to Mars, oh wait, our industries have caused global warming there too. Damn Martian polar ice caps.





reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 10:07 AM by Alphard
Originally posted by traderonwallst
reply to
post by Alphard



Nothing is wrong with protecting the earth. Just don't tell me how to live my life, force laws down my throat and take my taxes to clean something up I did not do.

Thank-you. This is exactly what I believe is the most important motivator of the people who preach 'there is no global warming'. It is just too uncomfortable to admit that they are actually also responsible and it is far too uncomfortable to change one''s habits. It is FAR easier to say that the message is incorrect. Just push the blame.

Laws are not bad themselves. We have laws that we should not kill people either. 'Don't force laws down my throat'? LOL indeed



Edit: Even if you do live in a bush somewhere and have NO impact on environment, you are still part of the human race and bear the collective responsibility of keeping our home clean. Does every member of your family only buy the food he or she eats? everyone only for himself herself? and everyone washes their own cloathes and dishes etc? there is such a thing as cooperation for the common good

[edit on 8-11-2007 by Alphard]


reply posted on 8-11-2007 @ 11:22 AM by traderonwallst
OK Examiner

You said: Take into account the fact that we a species are the only ones that burn things on regular basis. Consider the rest of the life forms on this planet don't.


I say: Forest fires burn land then "we" do every year. Whats causes most forest fires? Lightning. What allows them to spread? environmentalists not allowing to protectively thin out such forests.

You said: Volcanoes erupt, but is it a lot less often than we burn something? Less carbon?

I say: 1 major volcanic eruption will pump more climate altering gasses into the earth then man can do in a year

You said: How many billion people on the earth now?

I say: More people also following cleaner living practices, so I say it's a wash.
Hundreds of years ago, people were more concentrated in areas, now they are spread out across the globe. We burned more wood back then due to basic heating in our homes becuase we had not yet learned how to burn oil as a fuel.

You said: How many Volcanoes?

Do we know how much carbon all of the volcanoes spew into the atmosphere compared to what we do?


I say: please do not forget about all the active volcanos sitting below the surface of the oceans. Oceans make up 75% of the earth, thats a lot of volcanos. They are spewing their gasses directly into the oceans, playing directly into the heating of the worlds oceans.

You said: If the data shows that both human AND natural carbon emissions unnaturally accelerates the cycles of ice age, then indeed we ARE responsible for changing our climate.

I say: show me where you have aboslute proof this is occuring at a more rapid rate than it did 10,000 years ago. YOU CAN'T. Data is not available, so assumptions are made. Science is not based on assumption...THEORY is.

You said: Call it what you will.

I say: OK, I call it theory or junk science.

You said: I think this thread need some graphs...would anyone care to help me make some? Can we use Google Earth layers?

I say: Graphs? that will be based on data, that has been shown to be incorrect time and time again. Total time periods have been left out of these theories because they do not work to prove the point. Hence the debunking of the so called "hockey stick" theory, something AlGore relied on heavily in his production of the Incovenient(incorrect) truth.
By the way, we have seen the same graphs and charts posted on other threads, so save the bandwith......
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^