It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FredT
Really now the Americans with disabilites act is getting a bit out of control. Now web sites which are by and large a visual medium are being targeted?
Since the posts on this form are rendered in text format they are readable by pretty much any form of text to speech software, though the site fails WCAG 1.0 [Priority 1] (109 remarks) 107 of them are pretty much simply missing alt tags (which is a requirement of the html standard anyway) and 2 missing title tags for iframes.
All sites are legally required by law depending on which country the website is hosted in to be reasonably accessible to the disabled,
Funny you should pick that website, any reason why?
I ask because photobucket is (with the exception or 3 errors) WCAG 1.0 priority 1 complaint.
No one is saying your site cant be full of images, video, animations or anything else, what people are saying is your site should be standard complaint so anyone who visits it knows what the hell is on the site, in fact its generally in the website owners interest to make sure there site is complaint because if it isnt you simply get less visits and potentially less money, it doesn't get any simpler.
web standards and accessibility and listening to music are two completely different things, there not relevant in this case.
ever heard of Google translator? Regardless the language a site is in and making your site standards complaint are again two completely different things and not relevant here.
Now your being stupid.
Originally posted by Byrd
Here's a test page to check your code:
webxact.watchfire.com...
Originally posted by mattifikation
But the scenario presented was if I were blind AND deaf. How could I benefit from text to speech if I couldn't hear speech?
Originally posted by mattifikation
And furthermore, a ruling in favor of the ADA would either do nothing at all to help the blind access any website. Why not? Because the blind are still forced to provide their own text to speech software. OH! Should we now sue every web site that doesn't offer a free download of text to speech?
Originally posted by mattifikation
All sites are legally required by law depending on which country the website is hosted in to be reasonably accessible to the disabled,
What law? Since when?
You should learn more about what we are discussing, apart from the fact that the pictures there are personal pictures uploaded by users for there friends to see and not for any comercial purpose a site can have pictures and still be accessible to the blind.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Funny you should pick that website, any reason why?
I ask because photobucket is (with the exception or 3 errors) WCAG 1.0 priority 1 complaint.
Regardless of how compliant it supposedly is, blind people can't look at pictures. Looking at pictures is a central theme to photobucket, which is why I chose that site.
Originally posted by mattifikation
So if I make a web site selling, say, my services as a Flash Programmer (hypothetical, I am not one), I should have to attempt to describe in text form each of my examples of Flash work?
Originally posted by mattifikation
They are quite soundly (pun intended) relevant to one another, if you are talking about a music download website which a deaf person obviously could not benefit from.
Why Implement Accessibility?
* It's the Law: Disability Discrimination Act 1995 - Making reasonable adjustments to offer disabled persons the same service as every one else or risk prosecution and compensation claims.
* It's Economics: There are 9 Million registered as disabled in UK (over 2 million with sight problems). With an estimated disposal income of £50billion, you surely want a slice of this pie?
* Global Campaigns: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - have 3 levels of recommendations for universally accessible web design. The RNIB are leading a UK drive for better web design called 'See IT Right'. They get mass media coverage and are holding country-wide seminars.
* Competitive Advantage: - Get in First! Your customers may move to another service provider that does offer an accessible service. Your competitors may already be looking at re-designing their site to accessible standards. Do you want to play 'catch-up' or lead the field?
* It's Morally Right: It supports equal rights. Sites that are accessible also benefit other users. On-line retail is now deemed an essential service and should be accessible to ALL.
* Good for Public Relations: Be one of the first to be compliant and you attract positive attention from the media and open up an income stream that perhaps was not available before. You can use it in your press coverage and commercials
* Faster Web Page Performance: Accessible and streamlined content and navigation is faster to download. (i.e. less image intensive, easier to read, more logical and structured)
In a sense, there is no such thing as "ADA compliance" for web sites. While the ADA has been applied to web sites, it does not include specific guidelines for web site accessibility. In an effort to meet the spirit of the ADA, several organizations have adopted WCAG Priority 1 and Priority 2 Checkpoints as their standard for web site accessibility. Source