It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mdv2
Now Israel has used the same rethoric as Iranian president Ahmadinejad has used according to US and Israeli propaganda.
Originally posted by Cpt. Monty
reply to post by Sestias
Exactly. Israel is not in the wrong to issue a warning such as this, especially considering events in the this decade which have led Israel to fear further conflict with Syria. Since Syria has supported terrorist organizations in the past and currently do, Israel has every right to issue a statement such as this to illustrate the country's integrity and willingness to defend itself if Syria attacks with more force in the future.
Originally posted by wow23
Where is the proof that Syria has supplied any terrorist force?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by wow23
Where is the proof that Syria has supplied any terrorist force?
You've got to be kidding. Why would Carter choose to go to Syria to discuss a peace deal with Hamas, if there were no connection. Why did Nancy Pelosi go the Syria to discuss a peace deal with Hamas. That Syria and Hamas are connected is so obvious that no one doubts it, no one denies its, because the evidence is everywhere.
Of course, if you believe that there is not proof, all the proof in the world will fall on deaf ears.
But, nonetheless, here are some links for your edification.
www.cfr.org...
www.pmw.org.il...
www.meib.org...
/4jbebl
www.washingtoninstitute.org...
/3e8vbd
/3mm4n6
Originally posted by Cpt. Monty
reply to post by wow23
First off, the War Iraq Is not MY operation, and it is not MY war. My government made the decision, not me, so get that straight and don't point fingers at me please. I'm sure you are in fact aware of the crimes against humanity that Saddam Hussein had committed and been continuing to commit up until the invasion of Iraq by coalition forces...correct? Such as using biological and chemical weapons against the Kurds who lived in norther Iraq. That sounds closer to a Hitler type dictator than the current United States government does. And to say that this war was only supported by the UK and US is a very uneducated statement. FACT: the United States created a coalition of forces and invaded after it had enough support to deem it alright to invade. As the operations in Iraq have progressed over the years, more countries have sent forces into Iraq to help the United States and its allies to try and create peace within the borders of Iraq. The United States and United Kingdom are not there alone, and whoever told you that is poorly informed.
By the way, what country were your from that was oppressed? And what country do you live in now? If you don't mind me asking of course.
Originally posted by wow23
Also, Iraq was not at war until your country decided to bring it into war. So please do not sit on your high horse and preach peace in Iraq when your country broke a peace to steal a nations oil.
Originally posted by dave420
Oooh dear. Not more of this. Saddam was dangerous to whom, exactly? Certainly not the US.
Originally posted by Night Watchman
reply to post by wow23
Terrorist state? Israel? US? Interesting world view I must say. Clearly the poster is both misinformed and narrow minded. I suppose your wish fr a large scale attack on the US, which could kill tens of thousands of innocent people would make one wonder what kind of person would wish for such a thing?
Originally posted by wow23
And to the poster who said to see what the president said in his speechs, lmao.