It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
EMP style attack can explain why all cellphones were down. I couldnt make a call that day.
The cell phones went out. Why doesn't any one talk about that? Oh the planes did it right. The explosion emitted thermal radiation which shut down cell phones throughout all 5 boros. People are sleeping.
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
reply to post by Azriphale
Wow, cell phones were down in MN also?? I didn't know that! I don't buy it, the phones were jammed and all, how many people were making calls? 300,000 in that one 15 mile radius?? Not even. It's not plausible.
Originally posted by Azriphale
And new members responding to your posts is some sort of a conspiricy? Read the link i posted earlier. The networks cannot handle the strain of so many people calling at the one time.
Theres nothing for you to buy, networks going down because of the strain is a fact. Not directed energy....lol. Its suspicious that jane standley could report live that wt7 fell before it did with this so called EMP/DE. And all the other news channels reporting live and the helicopters circling the wtcs..... Do you see what im saying here?
Thread has offically been derailed.
Originally posted by Essedarius
The OP must give credit where credit is due to bsbray's lengthy post, leading to this conclusion:
Originally posted by bsbray11
...and when you divide it by the time the towers fell (power = energy / time), you get a power requirement that is greater than what the entire world's electrical generation could accommodate combined.
I think the kids these days call that "getting PWNED."
The problem I'm dealing with now is that I'm completely torn when I want to taunt someone who vomits this theory into yet another thread:
1)
Do I reference the virtual impossibility of a directed energy weapon with the power to cut through ONE column of a building, much less several?
2)
Or do I focus on the underlying idiocy of the "holographic planes" theory?
Decisions, decisions. It's like being an alcoholic on a brewery tour!!
Sandia's directed-energy group has successfully developed a highly compact high-voltage pulser capable of powering various directed-energy loads. The design uses Sandia's pulsed power experience and combines a battery-driven power supply and Marx generator in producing its output pulse. This development effort has resulted in a battery-driven pulser capable of delivering a 30 GW drive to a load. This extremely compact, lightweight, and rugged approach will enable many future directed-energy systems that require portable high-power drivers. Using technical assistance and advice provided by Sandia's Explosives Applications Dept. 15322 ‹ including on-the-ground support from Dale Preece ‹ the British Royal Engineers destroyed a cave complex on the border between the Paktika and Paktia provinces in Afghanistan on May 10, 2002. This Operation Enduring Freedom event was reportedly the largest explosion set off by the Royal Engineers since World War II.
Originally posted by Exopolitico
I find it very interesting how many are so quick to criticize Dr. Wood for her research.
Originally posted by Exopolitico
If thermite was used at the towers, why were papers flying the only physical objects visible?
Originally posted by Exopolitico
When WT7 fell, there were people filming and you could hear them whispering while the tower was falling, as if was just disintegrating/turning into dust.
Originally posted by Exopolitico
During a control demolition you hear the rumbling and the explosions taking place.
Originally posted by Exopolitico
Why was Hurricane Erin parked east of New York (Category 3 hurricane) and the weather service did not alert the citizens of New York at all?
Originally posted by Exopolitico
When the weather service was questioned about this they said "There was no hurricane there that day" or "We didn't know about it."
Originally posted by Exopolitico
Think of all the possibilities before you limit yourself to the explosion/thermite theory. I say theory because no one has been able to prove it.
Originally posted by K-illuminatiAfter doing lots of research i must say that john lear is right, they did use DEW (direct energy weapons) I have included proof below of govnt docs explaining this technology please click link and also since i cannot copy the chart into here please go see the chart at the bottom of page 9 in this pdf.
thermite was 100% used in the wtc because thats the only explosive that will cut such thick beams and then leave molten steal at the bottom, just google search "thermite found in wtc" and you will see the professor that tested debris samples and found thermite in the dust, that justs case closed proof all in itself there.
The University is aware that Professor Steven Jones’s hypotheses and interpretations of evidence regarding the collapse of World Trade Center buildings are being questioned by a number of scholars and practitioners, including many of BYU’s own faculty members. Professor Jones’s department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones.
"Start with page 9 for 1st and 2nd pdf, take notice to the pictures used"
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
EMP style attack can explain why all cellphones were down. I couldnt make a call that day. The world should remember that.