posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 03:26 PM
If Bush truly planned the attacks on 9/11 then isn't it safe to say that he could have blamed it on anyone he chose to? If he wanted to he could
have pointed the finger at some gangsters in Harlem right?
So here is my point. Everyone says the main purpose of the false flag attack was to gain support and to justify invading Iraq. So if this is truly
the case, then why not just blame Iraq instead of Al Qaeda? Bush could have simply gone on television and said something like, "The attacks of 9/11
were carried out by terrorists under direction of Saddam Hussein." Wouldn't that have made much more sense for his "plan?" Wouldn't this have
avoided all of the controversy today such as "If people from Afghanistan attacked us then why are we attacking Iraq?"
So my theory is that Bush had nothing to do with planning the attacks on 9/11. It was Bin Ladin and Al Qaeda, and Bush simply exploited the event and
used it to his advantage.