posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 06:36 AM
CO, you've brought up some valid points about that Coincidences Part 7 video that I sent to my friend to look at because, at least for now, I'm only
focusing on WTC7 .. so that's why I sent it to him.
There are some things they bring up in that video that sort of obfuscate what should be focused on in this case and I will show you what I'm talking
about in my next posts. Have since received a couple of other very short comments from my friend and will be posting them a bit later including my
replies to them.
As far as the 'pull it' thing that Silverman said in that interview, well, I would think, at least in your case, you would search for other
interpretations of that term than than a term used in the demo industry .... but if you could send me some links to pages that explain that Silverman
meant only to pull the cables I would like to see that.
At any rate, Silverman's a very, very old man -- and 'pull it' could have been a slip of the tongue sort of thing so I'm not ruling that out that
he actually DID mean to inform the fire chief to bring down that building. By the way, have you ever lived in NYC OC? I have. I went to Parsons New
School of Design in Manhattan and I've seen a lot of guys like Silverman and let me tell you... these guys are tough and EXTREMELY BRASH. Think Trump
and what he's like when the camera's are off. They don't mince words and they say it as they mean it. Silverman's of this breed. So for this
reason, I think his 'pull it' meant blow up the building and he said it on tv because he's an old man who's never been one for measured cadence
because that's just not his style.
He's the kinda guy who's used to saying what he damn well pleases and because he's so rich and surrounded by sycophants.. he's always gotten away
with that. But I'm sure it's his age more than anything else that allowed that 'pull it' snafus to occur. Obviously a man like Silverman has seen
better days where such mispokes would never ever happen or else he never would have gotten where he is now ... that's for sure.
And why didn't the insurance company raise a stink about WTC 7?
And why didn't NIST do an analysis on how that building came down?
And why did the 9/11 Commission Report totally omit any information about it too? It's like it never even existed!
So what the heck is going on here??
This is what I want to know and the fact that they are not releasing any information on their investigations on what happened to that building, to me
speaks volumes that they are covering up something... Jeesh, it's been six years now and still no information??
[edit on 14-9-2007 by Palasheea]