posted on Sep, 13 2007 @ 10:34 AM
Mr. Lear is right; there is no relation between cases. If someone wants to file another lawsuit and all the legal elements are there, then the suit
goes forward. the " Government ' cannot pick and choose what lawsuits it allows people to bring; the court decides based on factors that have
nothing to do with the veracity of the issues at hand.
That is just another poster who believe that the Govt. is some all powerful entity that can control all aspects of life, and we are not there quite
I too have a hard time with the ' no planes ' theory; it would seem to be very difficult for a holographic rendering of a craft to be that
effective in broad daylight; however, we are still left with the many anomalies that are part and parcel of this event. The ' planes ' act totally
differently than what one would expect from a large aircraft striking a solid stell structure: One might expect to see the building react more
radically, as far as movement goes, and the 'planes' seem to ' melt ' into the entire building before any explosions are seen erupting; surely the
aircraft would have made a gigantic fireball with tons of debris on the IMPACT side of the building, yet there is none to speak of.
In one film clip I saqw the ' plane ' ( 2nd one of course ) seems to be black as night even in diect sunlight, and the protuberance on the bottom
cannot be totally discounted although controversial. There are videos that show what seems to be ' cloaked ' aircraft, like a Stealth fighter or
such with ' orbs ' being released. Also, I recently saw a video that shows a definite beam of light, like a white lazer beam, that tracks across the
face of the Tower just prior to the impact. There is NO WAY that that is just some reflection, that is an AIMING light for sure.
OF COURSE the ' planes ' did not have anything to do with the ' collapses ' that followed; no way possible for gravity and fire to make
mutil-tons of concrete turn into a dust with the consistency of flour. Impossible. So the whole thing was a very advanced set up using various means
to achieve the effects we see; no doubt conventional explosives as seen in many videos making ' squibs ' and the resulting BOOMS attested to by
score of people there, as well as high energy weapons; there is NO OTHER explanation for those Towers turing to dust.
Dustification requires a vast amount of energy directed to a particular area, and that is exactly what we see happening on 9-11. No regular
explosives could have turned the concrete to dust.Only an advanced weapon using high energy could account for that. I am not sure about the planes; I
do NOT believe that they were the flights the official story states; there were switches as the facts show clearly and the planes were substituted for
the ones that were used for the effects we see.
This lawsuit may or may nor get the attention it deserves; if it is a spurious allegation, then that will be shown quickly. If there is some
substance to the whole thing, then that will be revealed as well. There is sufficient evidence to assume that the official story is a dead bang lie
and totally made up to fit the desired outcome; keep the sheepies asleep and quiet while the enemies of freedon and the Constitution ruin this nation.