This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


2015 NASA interstellar mission


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 18-1-2004 @ 02:51 PM by vorazechul


I was just wondering why the name \"space 2015\" when I remembered an artical in PopSci about BPP (Breakthrough Propultion Phisics) where an interstellar mission that NASA is hoping to launch in 2015 was mentioned

So does someone of you have more info on it

I personally hope it\'s true



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:00 PM by specialasianX


i believe they intend to send a man to mars around then... but other than that i havnt heard of anything



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:03 PM by THENEO


Interstellar? What did they mean by this? Further exploration of the milky way I assue.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:12 PM by vorazechul


I think a probe to the nearest star



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:19 PM by THENEO


Alpha Centauri? is it not the nearest star?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:20 PM by vorazechul


I just found that article in other room and it says in "25 years" sorry for the incorrect info the magasine is freom 2001



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:22 PM by vorazechul


it doesn't say to which star but it's logical to assume that it's the nearest one



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 03:33 PM by THENEO


I'm trying to remember the name of the star that they believed was closeby yet also likely to have planets in it's orbit?

Since the methods being used to detect planets are rather crude so far it maybe that Alpha Centauri does indeed have planets revolving it too.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 04:10 PM by vorazechul


aren't there any statements from NASA about something like that I really hope that such a mission is possible in the nearest future



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 04:22 PM by TheConservative



Originally posted by THENEO
Alpha Centauri? is it not the nearest star?


2nd nearest (Rigel Kentarus or A. Centauri). Proxima Centauri, which is in the Alpha and Beta Centauri star system, is the closest star to Earth, out side of our sun.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 04:28 PM by THENEO



Originally posted by TheConservative

Originally posted by THENEO
Alpha Centauri? is it not the nearest star?


2nd nearest (Rigel Kentarus or A. Centauri). Proxima Centauri, which is in the Alpha and Beta Centauri star system, is the closest star to Earth, out side of our sun.


Thanks, I did in fact confirm this not knowing that Alpha Centauri system was in total 3 stars.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 06:14 PM by ultra_phoenix


Since the Voyager probes have left our solar system, I guess we can say that NASA already has an " inter-stellar " mission. No ? Yes ?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2004 @ 06:19 PM by TheConservative


^ We could say that.

Interstellar travel is travel between star systems. Since Voyager is outside of our solar system and headed for the stars, we can say this.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-1-2004 @ 01:30 AM by MarkLuitzen


Then I like a new mision for nasa... trying to catch up with it so they have to redifine physics and make a new propulsion to catch up with it. F1 racing in space.

No what I really like is that they don't watch what the poll's say and just spend money in the right projects and go ahead with it. No matter what the polls on tv say. Cause people don't see the benifits but when the benifits arive they can't life without them. So just go and people can see what is coming out of it. They just have to bring out what they spin off with commercials. So a brand maker got stuff made from space tech they can say in the commercials... this is made possible by Nasa space Tech...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-1-2004 @ 06:50 AM by vorazechul


well nothing new under the sun eh
I'll just wait a bit and if someone of you stumbels over something on the topic whatever mission that involves interstellar travel just post ok?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-1-2004 @ 07:02 AM by KKing123


has Voyager ever actually left our solar system? i know comparitively it hasn't gotten very far

with the new propulsion systems it is feasible for us to build a probe that could build enough speed to get to the Alpha Centauri system within a human lifetime, Ion Propulsion could concievably used for up to half light speed, the only problem being, how to brake it into Alpha Centauri



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-1-2004 @ 07:27 PM by TheConservative



Originally posted by KKing123
has Voyager ever actually left our solar system? i know comparitively it hasn't gotten very far

with the new propulsion systems it is feasible for us to build a probe that could build enough speed to get to the Alpha Centauri system within a human lifetime, Ion Propulsion could concievably used for up to half light speed, the only problem being, how to brake it into Alpha Centauri


It is finally out of the orb cloud.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2004 @ 12:46 AM by cwzilly


We can't get any data from the Voyager can we? Or would it even matter, since it's to dark? I'm sure its to far.

Silly me; I don't know really, just getting into space "stuff".....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2004 @ 10:29 AM by MarkLuitzen


Lets go to the moon first and mars way later then the main part of being on the moon is aimed of trying to develope a new propulions system redifing physics and testing those prototypes in space were they supose to do there job. testing up to lightspeed kind of systems can not been done on earth cause they need exotic energy beginning from fision and fusion.
with a highspeed craft and with great moving in all direction. you could go everywhere in no time and do alot of stuf later.

[Edited on 20-1-2004 by MarkLuitzen]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2004 @ 11:49 AM by ShatteredSkies


wouldnt interstellar mean sending man into the fathest reaches of space and successfully colonizing other systems? thats wwut i think, but as to going to mars, its just a trip to our next door neighbor, in this case atmospheric neghbor.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.149 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread