It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Qantrix
the steel in the WTC was supporting a lot of weight
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Mine is more about high heat on a I beam, what does it do to it.
there is NOT ONE SHRED of evidence tying Osama to the planning or execution of 9-11 and that there is all sorts of circumstantial evidence saying something else was really going on.
Mohammed's role as the lead actor in the Sep. 11 plot, which he proposed to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 1996 and bin Laden set in motion in 1999, has long been established. It was described in detail in the 9/11 Commission report published in 2004 and in a written substitution for his testimony in last year's trial of al Qaeda conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui, who Mohammed says was tapped only for a "second wave" of post-9/11 attacks.
Originally posted by jprophet420
The guy that admitted to it is tied directly to Osama.
Google Video Link
Originally posted by bsbray11
The "scientific community" already knows exactly what would happen, for given ranges of temperatures. The only people that seem to be confused, are those that have given 2-seconds of thought to the WTC collapses, and are threatened by the idea that 9/11 was worse than we were told, and was an inside job. So they jump right to the conclusion, that it was anything but that, so the physics of steel at different temperatures is now apparently up for dispute in some cases. And also heated steel that's already in a steel-framed structure. Tests have been done there too, same thing.