It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Iraq no longer exists as a unified country. The experiment that was Iraq, the cobbling together of disparate and antagonistic patches of the Ottoman Empire by the victorious powers in the wake of World War I, belongs to the history books. It will never come back. The Kurds have set up a de facto state in the north, the Shiites control most of the south and the center of the country is a battleground.
There are 2 million Iraqis who have fled their homes and are internally displaced.
Originally posted by budski
I'm not sure they will pull completely out of the mid east - after all there is Israel to curb - without western intervention, they might very well end up bombing the rest of the mid east back to the stone age.
Originally posted by budski
I'm not sure they will pull completely out of the mid east - after all there is Israel to curb -
Originally posted by Karma2600
The underlying message behind this is that more troops are required. However thats now being argued against with a lets start to leave idea.
If Israel had no allies - they would soon be wiped off the map - nuclear weapons are no solution to sheer numbers of population. And they just dont have enough to bomb the middle east to knigdom come. Bearing in mind such action would merit a world wider dislike and unwillingness to assist them.
I think they are happy waiting for others to target their enemies then assisting as required.
Israel is content in looking after its backyard - it has more powerful friends to extend its interests further afield.