It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by ebe51
And an awesome plus is the debate is with that jerk Michael Shermer from Skeptic magazine, he lost. I like seeing Mickey lose.[edit on 2-8-2007 by ebe51]
Originally posted by ThaDewd
I can't watch the video now, I'm working. But no one has told me the scientific version of congregationalism or ID. The question on my mind though is who is the no-supernatural creator(s). Once the become supernatural, it is no longer science. I've heard ideas(not even a theory) that it was aliens and/or us from the future, but those always involve us influencing evolution, not creating life from scratch.
Will this video attempt to give me a scientific creator? or should i not bother watching it when i get home?
Originally posted by ebe51
As an example you will here about trees found standing up right in Earth layers which by evolution should have took billions of years to form. Yet, trees want stand up for billions of year while waiting for the dirt to pile up. A tree should fall and rot.
Originally posted by ebe51
Yeap his in jail for tax related charges. I knew this, yet it doesn't take away from the information provided.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
51, i provided a link that has all of hovind's lies in one spot. just look through it. i can't list every single thing because i'm not going to bother re-watching it (just watching it once gave me a headache from stupidity exposure). there is absolutely no evidence to support creationism. in fact, if there was evidence i'd be one of the first people to openly embrace it.
Originally posted by ebe51
Also kent was the only video I could find, and videos are more entertaining then endless web-site reading.
There are many web-sites they aren't sponsored by Kent. Do you want to go that route instead, sent you don't like Kent?
Originally posted by ebe51
It's free off google video and his web-site....
BUT WAIT, were getting off topic. I already said I don't care about personal stuff, he can be smoking crack with a hooker for all I care.
I want to debate the scientific evidence he provide.
Saying things like: "they believe that we came from rocks!" is a gross oversimplification of the debate, and bending terms and definitions to the point that one might call it lying.
Originally posted by pumert
I aint standin for this
I dont have too much scientific fact about creation but i have some
And i have a whole bunch of logic for debating about the bible to prove that it is true
almost everyone here is against you ebe51 But i am here with you and so is God