posted on Jul, 24 2007 @ 06:10 AM
Originally posted by iori_komei
...why do women not have to be included, I mean it's not like they cant fight..
Well, it's the law that women can't be sent to the front lines. Sexual discrimination perhaps, but I still think that's a good idea...At least, in
particular case. But still, women do join the Armed Forces & can do pretty well for themselves in more supportive vocations behind the
If women were allowed to go up to the front, think of how much more expensive it would be to require seperate quarters & other facilities. And let's
not forget that, in stressful situations under combat conditions, that some of the soldiers may get...distracted...in the trenches.
lead to serious problems if the enemy comes over the hill at "just the wrong moment."
Originally posted by shadow_soldier1975
...then you have to FINALLY admit MEN are better then women!! Equality isn't convienence ladies!!!!
A sexist remark if I ever heard one...I fully consider men & women to be equal, just different (& thank God for that
!). Man alone is
useless...Men still need
women & if you don't recognize that basic fact, then the whole human race would've been stillborn before we could
even develop a history.
Originally posted by Shar
I believe that not one of those candidates would send their daughter in too war. They should not ask the same of us.
In my opinion, if those delgates want war, make them
go fight it out with their own "enemy delgates" on the other side...We'll see how long
the concept of war (for the sake of politics) will last then, won't we? The problem is that those who want to declare war are those least
to fight in it. So they just use the media to whip up a public frenzy & beef up recruitment.
Our soldiers should be defending
the Nation, not trapsing all over the globe for political reasons.