It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Perle doesn't care if we find Iraqi WMD stockpiles

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 12:13 AM
link   
Does this surprise anybody???

"Two of President George W. Bush's military advisors said that the US inability to find illegal weapons in Iraq means little. 'I don't think that you can draw any conclusion from the fact that the stockpiles were not found,' Pentagon advisor Richard Perle said."

story.news.yahoo.com.../afp/20040109/pl_afp/us_iraq_weapons_defense_040109212053



He says we cannot draw any conclusions....so why did we INVADE in the first place????

[Edited on 11-1-2004 by McGotti]




posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Haha. Perle's reasoning is classic. Its a liar's last resort before admitting what everyone already knows.



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 05:21 AM
link   
"so why did we INVADE in the first place????"

TO LIBERATE THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ


JESUS H. CHRIST.



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 05:30 AM
link   
TO LIBERATE THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ

ahhahahahaha
fool



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 07:12 AM
link   
why they invaded could be read a whole lot of ways i guess... remember paul wolfowitz saying, "for bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on."
here in australia, our foreign minister said he was unsure what bureaucratic justification for the war meant.


[Edited on 11-1-2004 by peter]



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 08:51 AM
link   
www.newamericancentury.org...

Just read that and you'll understand why they had to invade Iraq, it's not that difficult to understand is it ? It's an age old goal and if someone still can't understand that, I think they have a little problem with reality.

Look at those who signed the letter.



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 09:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by peter
here in australia, our foreign minister said he was unsure what bureaucratic justification for the war meant.
Your foreign minister is exactly right. A beurocratic justification basically means that they had to find some excuse for a war that had no real reason for it.



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Couldn't agree with you more heelstone



posted on Jan, 11 2004 @ 04:01 PM
link   
12+/- years.....17 unfulfilled UN Resolution, namely 1441.



regards
seekerof



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
12+/- years.....17 unfulfilled UN Resolution, namely 1441.

regards
seekerof


There are many more countries with unfulfilled UN Resolutions.. what about those countries ?



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 04:25 AM
link   
Yeah, great I post the same thing: www.abovetopsecret.com...

and no one responds. Great. Fine. Be that way.
(silently wishes there was a middle finger emoticon)

[Edited on 1/12/2004 by Flinx]



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by TigeriS

Originally posted by Seekerof
12+/- years.....17 unfulfilled UN Resolution, namely 1441.

regards
seekerof


There are many more countries with unfulfilled UN Resolutions.. what about those countries ?




Seems to me to be a difference TigeriS. How so?
The US went to war against Iraq to free Kuwait. In such, in getting their collective military arses whooped, they agreed to a cease-fire agreement that constituted that they, Iraq, will get rid of all biological, chemical, nuclear, etc. WMD's. Whether Iraq did or didn't has been discussed over and over and over, and there is no need to rehash it in this thread.
Having said that, "those other countries" do not fall under the above mentioned criteria, thus bringing them into this discussion and situation is moot.


regards
seekerof

[Edited on 12-1-2004 by Seekerof]



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 11:24 AM
link   
"But no, society says don't tip these guys over here, but tip these guys over here. That's bullsh*t"-Mr. Pink



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by GeniusSage
"so why did we INVADE in the first place????"

We have a nice collection of puppet governments in place now... think about pre 9/11- the only (major) one in the area was Israel. Once we go after Syria (they're next), we'll have Israel, Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan, plus insignificant countries like Qutar and Kuwait. If you don't want to fight in the Middle East, now's not the time to join the guard or enlist.

Oh, and Saddam tried to kill W's daddy... boo hoo



posted on Jan, 12 2004 @ 12:20 PM
link   
The US is the new Roman Empire, battle and conquer



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join