This topic is in the Weaponry discussion forum.  (rss)


Anbody Aware of this?




Topic started on 9-1-2004 @ 03:11 PM by GabRaz


It seems Lockheed Martin and Bae have been working on the FCS projects for a while, yet i couldn't find any mention of their projects apart from a site i just past by per-chance. I crossed upo a pic of their version of the recon variant of FCS (note that the turret is unmanned and the hull has place for three crew members).

And i must say that their design is a lot more mature than anything by UDLP (United Defense-Bofors), or GDLS (General Dynamics-GM Canada) apart from the NLOS platform (all they've done are draw concept pics and build the test chassis).


external image

looks like its armed with the MK44 or Bushmaster III 35/50 supershot.

It also seems that Lockheed is working on the MEFFV (Marine Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles), or so I think because their the only ones with an EM gun requirement.


BLOS
external image

NLOS
external image

Weird.

Site: www.missilesandfirecontrol.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-1-2004 @ 03:15 PM by Krisboton


like the title says it looks cool and no i was not Aware

but the weird periscope is kind of hard to miss!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-1-2004 @ 03:19 PM by GabRaz


Check the site they have a pic of their recon thing in the middle of trees, the periscope really looks like its in its element.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-1-2004 @ 09:39 PM by Russian


nice stuff.

very informative.

but i dont like the FLAT noses.

head on shots really SUCK!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2004 @ 06:29 AM by GabRaz


I kinda missed that, they'd probably add ERA or additional armour, but that defeats the purpose of a light recon vehicle. In any case advances in ceramics and modular weapon systems may provide for a protective measure if the mistake of a flat lower glassis plate isn't corrected.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-1-2004 @ 11:34 PM by Russian



Originally posted by GabRaz
I kinda missed that, they'd probably add ERA or additional armour, but that defeats the purpose of a light recon vehicle. In any case advances in ceramics and modular weapon systems may provide for a protective measure if the mistake of a flat lower glassis plate isn't corrected.




they better have era or that is on EXPENSIVE peice of trash after one shot.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.008 seconds
Page processed in 0.070 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread