It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Frankenchrist
WOW! those are amazing!!! We have entered a world where you cant tell whats real and whats not. And thats exactly where they want us to be.
There will ALWAYS be doubt.
The only thing that doesnt look real are the lil people in the the heli.But I dont give it long before you will see John Wayne and Tom Cruise starring in a movie together one day.
Originally posted by 11 11
For clarification, I never said 3DS Max was mickey mouse. I said the render they made was mickey mouse. I use 3DSMax on a daily basis.
Originally posted by Springer
spf33, 11 11, and rwiggins:
GREAT WORK on getting the "shadow issue" resolved in a graphical way so everyone can see the reality.
Originally posted by Springer
Now that we have a graphical representation of IMPOSSIBLE lighting that anyone can look at maybe we can move beyond the CGI/not CGI argument and start really digging into WHY and WHO.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
1) Even if your shadow analysis were correct, it might as well be a badly lit model.
Originally posted by pjslug
Nice links that don't work.
Halo game makers have denied anything to do with a viral campaign for them. We've been through and through that road. Try some new ideas, something that hasn't been debated over and over and over again. Try reading the entire thread like the rest of us have.
No game company would release such an intricate plot to drones that have no relation to their game whatsoever which would in fact hurt their sales, since everyone on here agrees it would piss all of us off to find out it was a hoax perpetrated by them. In turn, that hurts sales, not help them.
You can't join in this thread at the very end without full knowledge of everything that has been said up to this point. I suggest you go back and read it.
Originally posted by whiterabbit29
Really not to sure what to make of this.
I was fairly sure that the explanations of the photos being CGI were a pretty fair guess, but this kinda opens things up again.
Anyway I'll post the link and see what everyone thinks
admin edit: Added "CARET" to title for clarity.
[edit on 6-28-2007 by Springer]
Originally posted by October
Another update on the Earthfiles website with a witness seeing a stop start drone. This one apparently looked Organic and there is a diagram of it:
It doesn't look like any of the other drones but it would appear that LMH is tying it into the whole drone story. What do you think?
I personally think it may be related simply because of the way the thing moved (If she's telling the truth that is)
Originally posted by chunder
It would be a shame if further investigation does not take place and this "story" just drifts away because to date nothing has been conclusively proven.
Edit to add: Maybe this Memphis drone is added to portray them as part machine/part life form. This one has not shed it's shell yet. It's a juvenile.