 |
reply posted on 31-7-2007 @ 06:05 PM by ULTIMA1
|
[edit on 31-7-2007 by ULTIMA1]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-8-2007 @ 01:47 AM by ModisOperandi
|
Greetings, this is my first post here so I hope everyone will forgive me if I somehow fail to contribute properly. Flight 93, WTC 1&2 as well as
building 7 must be a statistical miracle of astounding proportions. The probability equations would provide very interesting results I'm sure. We
here in Canada recently investigated a "conspiracy" of a different kind, that being our lottery systems and probable vendor corruption (stealing
winning tickets) The CBC program the fifth estate, contacted a mathematician to work out the statistical probability for what seemed to be a high
percentage of vendor wins. The figures were staggering and damning. This in part, prompted changes in the lottery nation wide. Does America believe in
cold hard numbers? We know it is a 14,000,000 to 1 shot to win at 6/49; an accepted fact. What would the figures be for buildings collapsing by fire?
How about just one building never mind three, on the same day. What is the probability for a total vaporization of a jet aircraft on impact? What
statistical analysis could be done to account for a complete lack of usual wreckage OR BODIES? Maybe use all the plane crashes, in all the world
(ever) as a base line. Or perhaps just start with crashes where the tail section is left intact as compared to obliterated. Air India. left bodies and
seats and luggage it was blown up mid-flight by a terrorist bomb. The wreckage would have impacted the sea at an incredible speed (hard as concrete
right?) The recovery was very moving and thorough but not done with tweezers so to speak. My heart/condolences go out to all affected on 911. I
believe (affected) includes everyone on this planet ultimately... dark times are upon us.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-8-2007 @ 07:42 PM by Pellevoisin
|
It is all Gulf-of-Tonkin to me...
But even with that "gut feeling" I think the truth is probably weirder than we would like to imagine possible.
Here is the eyewitness to the crash at Shanksville, PA via a link to YouTube:
Shanskville Eyewitness
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-8-2007 @ 11:51 PM by 2hedgehogsonalog
|
reply to post by Dr Love
Dr. Love, this has long been the one issue about that day that has left me wondering. I think people have confused the true value of eyewitness
accounts with eyewitness descriptions. Often times, descriptions of perpetrators of crimes, models of cars,etc are difficult to take into account
because of the strong presence of variables/ different perspectives. However, when someone says, and there were at least two witnesses (right?) they
saw a couple hundred people being led into the NASA building, that seems to me would have very few variables. Did anyone see those people leave that
building? I have searched for that answer, anyone have anything to help me along this dark path?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 11:47 AM by jfj123
|
reply to post by Dr Love
They died when the plane crashed in an empty field just outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, about 150 miles northwest of Washington, D.C. Their body
parts were scattered all over the crash site.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 01:14 PM by Dr Love
|
Originally posted by jfj123
Their body parts were scattered all over the crash site. 
There might have been body parts, but there were no plane parts. I've seen close-up pictures of plane parts, but that doesn't mean they were from
that plane or that site. Strangely similar to the wreckage, or lack there of, at the Pentagon.
Peace
[edit on 30-11-2007 by Dr Love]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 01:27 PM by jfj123
|
Originally posted by Dr Love
Originally posted by jfj123
Their body parts were scattered all over the crash site. 
There might have been body parts, but there were no plane parts. I've seen close-up pictures of plane parts, but that doesn't mean they were from
that plane or that sight. Strangely similar to the wreckage, or lack there of, at the Pentagon.
Peace
[edit on 30-11-2007 by Dr Love] 
There were also plane parts at the scene. Even John Lear admits there were plane parts at the scene.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-11-2007 @ 06:32 PM by jfj123
|
I think it's an incredible insult to the memories of those who lost their lives on flight 93 to "speculate" about what happened when we know what
happened. Pretending something different is just wrong.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-12-2007 @ 08:02 PM by Xe550
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 12:50 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
Why Oh Why is the possibility that America,in its usual arrogant way,thinks that no one,especially "ignorant muslims" would have the balls to plan
an attack on American home soil. Just face the facts, the USA was caught with its pants down. Don`t disrespect all the victims of this terrible
tragedy, the phone calls recorded were from frightened,yet brave souls saying goodbye to their loved ones. The real curly questions are why
Osamas,super wealthy relatives were whisked out of America quick smart, the We can`t find Osama excuse is wearing thin and Lets focus on invading Iraq
(we need that oil) and toppling Suddam Hussein. Yes he was a dictator but there a plenty of despots in Africa that seem to go around decimating
civilians,but who gives a crap there is no oil reserves. And of course the Georgian /Russia conflict happens to have oil rich territory in dispute.
9/11 was used to gain oil and strengthen militarypower.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 04:42 PM by Swampfox46_1999
|
You know, I keep seeing this recurring theme about Flight 93. First, CT'ers ask for pictures of plane wreckage. When you post them, then they say,
well how do I know where those pictures were taken. From the size of most of the wreckage, any pictures taken that would show the crash site, would
then make it unable to tell its wreckage from the plane.........
Like I have told more than one person on here, because you were not taken by the hand on 9/11/01 and shown the crash site, you will never believe it,
no matter how much evidence you are shown.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-8-2008 @ 04:54 PM by Swampfox46_1999
|
reply to post by ModisOperandi
Few problems with your "odds"
The three buildings collapsed due to extreme damage and fire, not just damage, and not just fire. Each tower had an airliner crash into it at high
speed and building 7 was clobbered by tower 1 when it collapsed. (so much for "they fell into their footprints)
Side note, Griff, Ultima, Bsbray etc....do not hop in with your "Well NIST isn't sure exactly what happened" I know that, and NO ONE will ever
know exactly which beam failed when that led to the collapses...thats what NIST gets confused on. Ignoring the forest because they are focused on a
tree..
Each aircraft left pieces of itself in each of the crash sites. Whoever said "vaporized" first, did a great injustice.....only because CT'ers
jumped on it.
In addition, personal effects belonging to passengers on the four jets were recovered from the crash sites.
And while the people going through the wreckage did not use tweezers (actually in some cases they did, but I wont confuse the issue), the wreckage WAS
gone through.
So, what gives you better odds...19 terrorists crashing planes into buildings and causing them to collapse...or a vast conspiracy of thousands that
manages to wire three buildings for demolition (in record time btw) with no one notices, and no one has a conscience attack and talks???????
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |