It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No its not, the official story is that there were windows there, its up to you to prove that there wasnt any.
Originally posted by selfless
I'm sorry, I didn't intend to say there were no windows for sure.
And with all due respect, you can't prove to me what hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet.
Same goes for me to you.
Originally posted by Flyer
]No its not, the official story is that there were windows there, its up to you to prove that there wasnt any.
Originally posted by Flyer
I believe there was a conspiracy involved on that day but you are discrediting any theory whether its intentional or not.
Originally posted by racerzeke
If the plane didn't have windows, what would be the advantage of that? How come the government couldn't just use a plane with windows so it wouldn't be so obvious?
Originally posted by selfless
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
Looks like someone went through this thread and rated ALL my posts one star. Thanks. I really appreciate it.
Hello my 1 star brother :0
Originally posted by selfless
I would like to apologize to everyone for the way I did my Op.
I Don't want to say that the plane was not a passenger plane and wish I could edit my OP but i can't anymore.
FROM THIS POINT ON.
Please, let's make this thread about finding out if the planes had windows or no windows.
Neither of them has been confirmed so therefor won't be confirmed until one of them is proven.
Again I'm sorry and i assure you that, I am completely open to the possibility that the planes had windows or that the planes had no windows.
Let's all be equals and try to find which one is true with out bias.
Originally posted by selfless
Speculation: Perhaps it was a specialized plane with such a solid core that windows on it would be too structurally weak.
Originally posted by FredT
This is where you argument is at it weakest point IMHO. Why would the government, et al go through all this trouble to do this and not actually use the aircraft in question? Why would they run the risk of having thier carefully woven plot unravel by using different aircraft? And you can spot windows on aircraft, even those moving at high speed. If you can pick up the tail numbers of an F-15 moving at high speed during an airshow 500-600 knots, seeing windows is no problem at all.
Originally posted by selfless
You are right SR,
But imagine if someone finds footage or a photo somewhere that would prove one or the other, that would be great.
Problem is, It will only be confirmed when we find footage of the planes that shows windows because showing footage that suggests no windows could still be debatable since it wouldn't be sure if there are windows or not.
So I guess this is all a paradox.
Oh well, perhaps some day we will find good footage that will show windows or something that shows no windows(probably not).
Originally posted by selfless
People who knows jets, I would like to ask a question.
Is this normal to be under an air plane?
In this photo they say that this is not normal but i won't just believe that statement before anyone here with aviation experience tells me wetter this is normal or not.
Please, don't think that I'm saying it's not normal. I am asking the question here because I don't know.
[edit on 9-6-2007 by selfless]
The fuselage bulges out where the wings join it. This is called the wing fairing. The landing gear assembly folds into this area when it is retracted, which is seems to be a problem if the alleged pod is a missile launcher.
As is clear in comparing the photos above, under the right lighting conditions the wing fairing can look more pronounced. Notice how the reflected sunlight (specular highlight) on the right side of the plane in the center photograph changes from the fuselage to the fairing. This will be important later.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Look on the link I provided. There are three that show almost the exact same thing that is in that video from different angles. But you can clearly see the same thing.
Originally posted by sensfan
Zaphod, the pics you posted show a normal looking underside of the plane. Perhaps you should go look at some of the other 9/11 threads that deal with that issue and I don't think we should derail this one, which is about windows on the planes.
Thanks.