Ah. Blood diamond was quite the watercooler topic in South Africa. And it made De Beers, the diamond giant, a bit nervous, and they had to do a good
amount of "damage control" by pointing out fact and fiction...
Johannesburg - The chairperson of diamond giant De Beers called on the sector, jittery about its reputation following the Hollywood film "Blood
Diamond", to help bring exploited illegal miners into the formal industry.
...
Although the Kimberley Process, under which governments certify exports of legitimate diamonds, has helped curtail the extent of so called "conflict
diamonds", the sector is still nervous about attacks on its integrity.
"Our reputation as an industry is paramount. As purveyors of luxury goods, we are entirely at the whim of the consumer, who has many alternative
choices for his spending," Oppenheimer said.
Source
As for the movie... Usually Hollywood movies about Africa and South Africa are a source of hilarity to local audiences as Hollywood tends to get so
many details about this country wrong. But what South African audiences usually find the most entertaining (or insulting, depending on your sense of
humour) is when Hollywood actors attempt a "Souf Effrican" accent. (One can only imagine how they have mangled other “ethnic” accents in the
movies throughout the years then, particularly in all those movies featuring the poor Russians as villains!)
However, in Blood Diamond I'm happy to say that while DiCaprio doesn't always get the accent right, he at least gets the character spot on. Or maybe
the role was just well-written, as the screenplay at least seems decently researched with an eye for detail and an ear for the local tongue.
Just for the record, I'm no fan of DiCaprio, in fact I'm quite the opposite...
Blood Diamonds gets other things right too, mostly by casting local actors such as Arnold Vosloo and Marius Weyers as Afrikaner diamond smuggling
heavies. One detail that is straight out of the Hollywood cliché rule book though is when DiCaprio's character visits the Stellenbosch vineyards of
his employers and there are machinegun-wielding heavies all over the place guarding it like one always sees with Columbian drug lords in the movies.
Very unlikely.
The movie is however unsure of itself, and can never make up its mind whether it is a searing indictment of the illegal diamond business or an
adventure/action story – a more serious-minded Romancing the Stone or something.
The picture isn't pretty, but accusations of racism are unfounded. Blood Diamond takes place during the 1999 civil war in Sierra Leone and at that
stage in history there were few places any worse on planet Earth. Like its diamond smuggling main character you'll also want to get the hell out of
this “godforsaken continent” after seeing Blood Diamond.
The movie makes the sallient point that while Africa is rich in minerals such as diamonds and gold, its people aren't. Africa is still the poorest
continent on the planet, and the same mineral wealth that would have been a blessing in any other scenario is just a curse in this one as Cleptocratic
African elites and amoral Western interests take advantage and bleed these supposedly “blessed” countries dry as their citizens suffer in
anguished silence.
“It has always been like this,” DiCaprio's character remarks at one stage, and later on the point is reinforced as another character remarks how
Belgian colonists hacked off the limbs of locals that “slacked” at their slave chores, pretty much the same way we see sadistic Sierra Leonean
“rebel forces” do earlier.
“At least we don't have oil,” one poor local remarks. “Then we would have had REAL problems!” Amen to that, brother.
Blood Diamond tries to tack on a happy and hopeful ending but, as the end titles inform us, “there are still 200 000 child soldiers in Africa .”
Edit: Sp
[edit on 22-3-2007 by Gemwolf]