|
reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 02:31 PM by ULTIMA1
|
Originally posted by Pilgrum
The necessary correction of 11 degrees to the DFDR magnetic bearing puts the plane on the right course to take out the poles and consequently south of
the Citgo.
But what about the police witnesses who saw the plane on the other side of the Citgo?
Also waiting for an explanation for the following.
The security camera video shows an object flying straight and level, the FDR from the plane shows the plane was in a nose down atitude.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-7-2008 @ 02:31 PM by ULTIMA1
|
double post
[edit on 24-7-2008 by ULTIMA1]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-9-2008 @ 07:08 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
Bush needed a reason to go after Hussein!!!!!!!
If you look in the latest issue of the Atlanta-Hartfield newspaper in A1 and A12, Bush clearly stated that" he had no intention and won't go after
bin laden. And he will probably be dead before any of us figure it out." If a plane went into the Pentagon. I've been in the Pentagon. Its dense
construction. The plane would be hanging out of the building.
Think about it!!!
Sept 2nd-A memo was left from Clinton to Bush. that he felt Bin Laden was responsible for USS Cole. Bush went to Camp David and sat on his ass. And
sat on it again, hosting to the Saudi's and listening to children read stories on 9/11. Foreign policy kills!!!!
US went into Kuwait. Why?
Kennedy was killed because he saw no basis for Vietnam; Has anyone notice that the Vietnam government has not or just maybe made a deal with devil to
counterattack us? Johnson is Bush; Bush is Johnson.
You can not make a dictatorship country into a democracy. Look how long it took the United States to be a democracy and we still haven't got our
crap together.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-9-2008 @ 02:30 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
so if nothing to hide why run around collecting every bit of camera footage, and then months after release some footage that does not show much. hmmm
i guess we will have to try and wait the 50 years till all that other footage is released.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-12-2008 @ 10:33 PM by Realtruth
|
Looks like there is more hard evidence that people are digging up. I have read quite a few threads now that are making me stand up and notice.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 10-12-2008 by Realtruth]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:20 AM by Realtruth
|
Here we go again. Now we have a person inside the Pentagon that has filed a lawsuit because they don't think a Plane hit the Pentagon and that an
evacuation order was not given.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Career Army officer sues Rumsfeld, Cheney, saying no evacuation order given on 9/11
rawstory.com
 A career Army officer who survived the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon, despite flight
controllers calling in warnings of approaching hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was struck.
Gallop also says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and
Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office. (visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2009 @ 11:47 PM by Denali2009
|
Go to Youtube and search 757 low flyby then vertical and watch the pentagon strike flash movie. When I see the video of a 757 flying into the
pentagon, I will believe the rest of the world.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2009 @ 11:57 PM by turbofan
|
reply to post by Realtruth
Video links are now "gone".
Do you happen to recall the name of the video so i (we) can search for
it on YouTube?
Thanks.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2009 @ 05:55 AM by Denali2009
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2009 @ 07:09 AM by trebor451
|
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
This guy is kind of trying to make a good point IMO.
The fact that the plane also had to fly so low to make such an "attack run" at such a high speed...well, i'd most likley get sucked to the ground
under the reverse pressure it has under it and crash tens of yards before it's target.
That's percision flying that even veteran commercial pilots can't pull off.
"Reverse pressure"? "Flux capacitor"? "interstellar transmogrifier"? What the heck are you talking about? What is "reverse pressure"?
"Ground effect" is what wants to keep an aircraft in the air when they are low and a cushion of pressurized air builds up below the aircraft, but
eventually gravity wins and no amount of ground effect air will keep something flying when lift over drag becomes nil.
"Crash tens of yards before its target?" Its amazing ANY aircraft can even land on a runway! "Reverse pressure" would cause them to crash tens
of yards before the runway!! Its a miracle!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 2-10-2009 @ 07:21 AM by tezzajw
|
Originally posted by trebor451
Its amazing ANY aircraft can even land on a runway! "Reverse pressure" would cause them to crash tens of yards before the runway!! Its a miracle!
Landing speed of a 757 is about 160 mph?
Alleged speed of Flight AA77 was about 460 mph?
What are you trying to compare, trebor?
In your self-alleged 25 year career working for the government DoD, were you ever taught that comparisons are only useful when they're relevant?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-10-2009 @ 05:19 PM by trebor451
|
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by trebor451
Its amazing ANY aircraft can even land on a runway! "Reverse pressure" would cause them to crash tens of yards before the runway!! Its a miracle!
Landing speed of a 757 is about 160 mph?
Alleged speed of Flight AA77 was about 460 mph?
What are you trying to compare, trebor?
In your self-alleged 25 year career working for the government DoD, were you ever taught that comparisons are only useful when they're relevant?
You going to put on your whirly-bird beanie and tell us all about "reverse pressure", at 160 OR 460 mph? get TF to help you out. or Cap't Bob.
he should be up on that "reverse pressure" that will cause an aircraft to crash "tens of yards short of its target".
|
copyright & usage
|
 |