Here's another article from Scientific American with some interesting points on the subject:
FDA set to approve controversial cow drug: report
The FDA's own advisors, the Veterinary Medical Advisory Committee, voiced such concerns when they voted in September to reject approval of cefquinome
by InterVet Inc. of Millsboro, Del., which makes it.
Yet the Post quoted experts as saying the FDA was moving toward approval anyway, overriding the advice of the panel, the American Medical Association
and other health groups.
The Post said the FDA was being pressured to approve the drug because of an internal guidance document called "Guidance for Industry #152" on how to
weigh threats to human health from by proposed new animal drugs.
It quoted experts saying the rule makes it difficult for the FDA to deny a new animal drug unless it is likely to threaten the effectiveness of an
antibiotic critical in treating food-borne illness.
Edward Belongia, an epidemiologist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation in Wisconsin, said that made it difficult for the FDA to say no to
some drugs, according to the newspaper.
"The industry says that 'until you show us a direct link to human mortality from the use of these drugs in animals, we don't think you should
preclude their use,"' it quoted Belongia as saying.
"But do we really want to drive more resistance genes into the human population? It's easy to open the barn door, but it's hard to close the door
once it's open," he was quoted as saying.
InterVet developed cefquinome to treat bovine respiratory disease, the most common disease in cattle. But more than a dozen antibiotics are on the
market for the respiratory syndrome, and all are still effective.