New terror alert is to hide damaging info on Saddams capture.

Originally posted by FULCRUM


(How, where and orginally by whom is irrelevant.)

It is relevant just another lie in the huge list the Bush Administration has told the American people. Including the big lie 9/11

[Edited on 21-12-2003 by DiRtYDeViL #ing typos]

[Edited on 21-12-2003 by DiRtYDeViL]

I know this..

But it really doesnt bother me (at the moment..) because i know that they are lying all the time, and about everything.



It is the people that cant see this that make me mad.

Originally posted by namehere

Originally posted by DiRtYDeViL

Originally posted by namehere
DiRtYDeViL, lol you have shown 0 facts, just assumptions and heresay.

Lmao what the hell more do you need?

proof of what was said but never confirmed by any source.

I just showed you a time line of what went on that week that they didn't want you to see. If you want to believe it's all lies Jackson wasn't arrest and car bombs didn't go off in Turkey, and there where no protest in London while Bush was visiting that�s your #ing problem be a sheep I don't care I showed you the facts it's up to you to put 2 and 2 together and get 4. If you can�t handle that this administration is corrupt to the bone that�s your problem go cry on Ken Lays shoulder.

Seems ironic that on the 20th this article was released:
"Close Saddam aide was his downfall"
Link:
www.iht.com...

Tabloids are making big bucks these days aren't they?

regards
seekerof

Originally posted by Seekerof
DD"
"WTF WAKE UP................."

Excuse me?

Explain why the Kurds would put Saddam in a "spiderhole" with a loaded pistol and two loaded AK-47's and with $750,000 in cash? How about explain why the Kurds, with what Saddam has done to them, did not literally tear him apart or make him into dice sized pieces and then put him in the "spiderhole"? Kurds would have gotten him, he would be dangling from a tree and castrated......

I mean geez....that was very nice of the Kurds wasn't it?!?
Does the article(s) explain how the Kurds infiltrated the middle of Sunni Triangle to get Saddam?
It amounts to a badly sourced article.


regards
seekerof

Great point!! But one problem who knows what was really there I thought the 2 packs of un opened underwear seemed wierd. I was hoping they would have found a penis pump or anal dildo cause anyone who watchs south park knows Saddam is really into anal sex with the devil hahaha

Originally posted by Seekerof

Tabloids are making big bucks these days aren't they?

regards
seekerof

Just wondering..

First news i heard about this was:

US forces have captured Saddam Hussein with the help of Kurdish forces..

After initial news.. not a single mention about the Kurds..

Maybe the first news were most accurate.. eh?



(This was before i got here to see that have people already posted something about this.. and think i was quite quick.. as my first post to the matter was at Dexxys posts 1st page.. if i remember correctly.)

This isn�t a tabloid story the right wing nuts are just having a hard time believing George W. Bush isn�t Jesus Christ. Plus they get off on war they love it. Nothing better then killing some poor dark colored skinned heathens hell that�s an American tradition don�t you know.

Neither are these "tabloid stories" DD?

"Saddam betrayed by his wife"
Link:
www.news.com.au...

"Isreal's Sharon visited Baghdad and met the jailed Saddam Hussein"
Link:
www.ynet.co.il...

"Bush met Saddam on November 27"
Link:
www.iribnews.com...

"Nerve Gas Used" in Capturing Saddam"
Link:
www.novinite.com...



Most of these were carried on many "news media" sources........
What makes the Kurd 'conspiracy' theory any different?



regards
seekerof

I like this one
www.news.com.au...

the rest are total bs.

Pretty soon Fox will have to report it and then you will believe it. Just like one day they are going to have to report Bush was behind 9/11

Originally posted by Seekerof

What makes the Kurd 'conspiracy' theory any different?



regards
seekerof

Eeeh..

Nice dodge there..

First reports said that Kurds helped..

All the first reports..
(TV, Radio..)

Then it was 'buried'..

DD:
"the rest are total bs."

Thank you for clarifying that cause thats exactly how I feel about the ones you have provided.
Isn't strange that the big mainstream news media isn't carrying this story? Self-evident, I would imagine.

Perhaps they need to add the Kurds capturing Saddam and then releasing/handing him to eventual capture by US forces in the growing list of conspiracy theories related to Saddam's capture?
"Conspiracy Theories Surrounding Saddam's Capture"
Link:
www.memri.org...


regards
seekerof

I frankly dont care if we captured him, the Kurds, the Russians or some Wal-Mart employee. I am just glad we got um'.

Main stream media Australia has the story. Others are catching up. Remember the American media is run by 5 companies now it�s controlled. But it will get bigger by tomorrow night muhahahaha more bad news for your boy Bush.

Originally posted by Dreamz
some Wal-Mart employee.

Hmmm this would make a really good one.

You know this could be a ploy by the Kurds to try and gain the 25 million dollar prize. For 25 million, I might just say the same thing.

Ouch yet another news source has picked it up.
quote.bloomberg.com...
it's coming out the truth and it's coming fast!

www.theage.com.au...

Finally conspiracy planet gets the story
www.conspiracyplanet.com...
sify.com...
www.novinite.com...

Neos about to hang up the phone on Rove. hahaha

D-D,

All of the sites you've linked to are extremely biased sources. To be frank, the fact that one of these is a site PRETENDING to be the real ABC News one, alone, probably discredits your whole topic. I mean, really, if your source is, itself, a fraud... Odds are its story is bogus, too.

Originally posted by onlyinmydreams
D-D,

All of the sites you've linked to are extremely biased sources. To be frank, the fact that one of these is a site PRETENDING to be the real ABC News one, alone, probably discredits your whole topic. I mean, really, if your source is, itself, a fraud... Odds are its story is bogus, too.

It's not pretending it's the Australian broadcasting company not the American. The American media is avoiding this story like they do anything that could hurt the war effort.