It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Media faking pictures?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2003 @ 05:31 PM
link   
Have a look at this story. I know some of this is out there and why, but I wonder HOW deep the rabbit hole goes?

media.guardian.co.uk...

In this day and age, you cannot trust anything you read, hear, or see I guess.

What are your thoughts on what the media does or what they did in this case? Wrong or not?



posted on Dec, 18 2003 @ 06:12 PM
link   
Agreed that the media must indicate to its readers any fabrication in work submitted as journalism especially if known.

Mind you that would greatly reduce their output wouldn't it?



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Oh My God...peple faking pictures? How do they do it?



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Well...remember a few years ago when some magazine or newspaper in the US got in trouble because they printed a picture of OJ Simpson in which they were said to have intentionally made his skin darker.

Of course it was all because the darker your skin is the more guilty you are!
People are nuts.



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jonna
Well...remember a few years ago when some magazine or newspaper in the US got in trouble because they printed a picture of OJ Simpson in which they were said to have intentionally made his skin darker.

Of course it was all because the darker your skin is the more guilty you are!
People are nuts.



that's a very racist point of view..

the black race secluding/isolating themselves from the rich and white could be possibly a reason...any1 up for saying something on those lines??



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 01:00 PM
link   
Alteration of images and video footage is common in TV and newspapers. THat's my own experience from working at one big tv station which also dealt with magazines/newspapers.

Anyways I think it is not bad at all. It depends if it is altered in the understanding of "illustrating" it is ok for me. When a picture is altered as proof of something it's against all press ethics.



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cyrus

Originally posted by Jonna
Well...remember a few years ago when some magazine or newspaper in the US got in trouble because they printed a picture of OJ Simpson in which they were said to have intentionally made his skin darker.

Of course it was all because the darker your skin is the more guilty you are!
People are nuts.



that's a very racist point of view..



Hey, it's not my opinion; it is just what I remember being said. Notice the
!



posted on Dec, 23 2003 @ 01:15 PM
link   
So, like, if the media were to use this as "proof" of aliens:



That would be wrong?



posted on Dec, 27 2003 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by junglejake
So, like, if the media were to use this as "proof" of aliens:



That would be wrong?


i knew aliens were real! thats sure shot proof right there.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join