Nearly an hour and no one has hacked my account... hmm... I wonder why... hahahaha

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Blatantly faked,

Just look at the clouds,

Between picture 2 and 3 there appears to be "significant" cloud movement.

Overlay picture 2 and 3, if you have the ability to make one image 'transparent' using software, it's clear to see the clouds have more movement than the object between the two pictures.

My point being simply, the object must have have been moving at a snails pace or the clouds were moving at hurricaine speed.

I don't see this movement at all. I checked it several times, and the clouds I can identify (vs. just a white haze) stay in exactly the same place relative to the trees. Since the view swings quite a bit to the right between 2 and 3 there aren't many clear clouds to use for comparison. Perhaps if you could post you own analysis it would be clearer.

Between 1 and 2, the result is very clear - no movement of the clouds.

Yes i remember this one, 2007 the thread started, phew ive been on here too long!

It was really intriguing at the time but like a lot of the others, it sort of fizzled out..

With all the recent "hubbub" in the Aliens and UFOs forum regarding UFO photo authenticity, I thought it a good idea to resurrect an old thread that highlights one of the more interesting sightings that came our way.





These photos found their way to us as a result of our extended coverage of the O'Hare Airport UFO sightings, and Springer's appearance on the Coast To Coast AM radio program. The sighting took place south of Chicago, soon after the O'Hare incident.

They've sparked quite a lot of discussion, and relatively little calls of "hoax" from those examining the photos in detail.


I thought it might be nice to inject an unsolved "blast from the past" into the current mix here.

I'm always suspicious of a series of photos where the UFO in question just "conveniently" happens to be in full view of the person taking the photo, even when it drops below treetops.

Otherwise, as has been mentioned before, the thing must have been coasting along pretty leisurely for the cloud formations to have changed so drastically during the course of its flight.

And finally, even if it was "real," what good is it without additional evidence? Without more evidence, even the best most authentic photos are nothing more than curiosities.

I had to rotate the center photo to have the scenery and fencing line up. IMHO this means that if the object had been pasted in it would have been "off" when I rotated the scenery to fit. As it is its following a perfect line and the object is at the same angle once I rotated the image as the other two.

The clouds seem to line up fairly well if you account for the movement between shots.

I can't debunk it at this resolution and size.

I'm bumping up this image for reference.

Originally posted by 12m8keall2c

Bumping up the 4th photo:

Been a while since i saw this thread...

Just a few comments in general, everyone seemed so wrapped up in the photos themselves the background seemed to become lost in the noise..


Lets deal with anonymity first...


You live in pretty close proximity to a Nuclear Plant and you start sending pics of UFOs all over the world willy nilly. It wouldn't take a rocket scientist in the security services to work out who you are withing 20 odd people, inside an hour. They already know the person's identity anyway, as they reported it to homeland security. Ergo having done so, and you want to live a quiet life, you might well think it worthwhile to *forget the pictures* and have someone, a little more au fait with technology delete them for you.

Youngsters, however, have slightly less fear of the authorities and tend to be a tad naive about how east it is to be tracked down even when being *anonymous*. So they think , hey this is interesting no-one will know, i will pass it on. I don;t see anything that untoward in that sort of story.

As for it looking like a hoax.... you mean something like the USAF dropping flares over Phoenix, unscheduled flares at that, the same night a huge UFO is reported over the length of AZ? Nahhh, they'd never try a deliberate hoax to cast aspersions on a genuine sighting would they?