It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flight 93 Propaganda Began on 9/12/2001

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Here's a link to a news story that appeared on Pittsburgh's WTAE-TV website on September 12, 2001.

www.thepittsburghchannel.com...

Notice these interesting facts:

* 24 hours after Flight 93 crashed, CNN had already obtained a transcript from the cockpit voice recorder stating that a) there was a bomb on board, and b) the voice was in "broken english."

How did CNN get this sensitive transcript in less than 24 hours?

* Presidential Press Secretary Ari Fleischer stated that the White House and Air Force 1 were the "targets" of Flight 93. How could he have possibly known this? How could anybody have known this?

* Congressman John Murtha decided that the passengers were heroes. ""It sure wasn't going to go down in rural Pennsylvania," U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said Wednesday. "The target was Washington, D.C. Somebody made a heroic effort to keep the plane from hitting a populated area. I would conclude there was a struggle and a heroic individual decided 'I'm going to die anyway. I might as well bring the plane down here.'"

How could John Murtha know this on Sept. 12, 2001? How could Murtha conclude that the target was Washington D.C.?




posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 01:11 PM
link   
This is why disinfo is given to the other 9/11 movements that have to deal with the WTC. The real conspiracy is the fact that the US shot down a civilian airliner, namely Flight 93. They were qucikly made heroes, and there were no more questions.

I mean, isn't is more plausible that we shot down 93 then Mossad used super thermite to collaspe the WTC 1,2 and 7. Sensationalism is a major distraction that is used to easily sway those that will believe what is told to them without research.

Look into the other players on 9/11 that dealt with Flight 93. There was no stand down order.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 01:33 PM
link   
How many people do you think would have to be involved in a conspiracy to cover-up the shooting down of Flight 93?

I also think the evacuation of Pittsburgh's Air Traffic Control tower at 9:49 am on 9/11/01 is a red flag that something was drastically wrong. The FAA also ordered all flights grounded in the U.S. at 9:49 am.

Why would they evacuate the Pittsburgh ATC tower when flights were still in the air, and when they could track Flight 93 from this tower? The only reason to evacuate the control tower is if they didn't want anybody to see what was on radar, or hear the voice transmissions, imo.

The FAA can't seriously expect anybody to believe that they evacuated the control tower for the safety of the controllers. In fact, evacuating the control tower in Pittsburgh implies that there was somebody else tracking Flight 93.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Did you even read your own article you posted?


SHANKSVILLE, Pa. -- A partial transcript has been obtained by CNN of talk heard by air traffic controllers via an open microphone in the cockpit of United Flight 93, which crashed in Somerset County, Pa.


The first phrase was "There is a bomb on board."


And about the Aries Fleischer mentions that the plane that hit the Pentagon was meant for the White House? Why would he say that? Wasn't it part of the plan for conspirators that the plane that hit the Pentagon was intentional?


Meanwhile, presidential press secretary Ari Fleisher said that the White House and Air Force One were intended targets of those attacks. Apparently, the plane that struck the Pentagon was intended for the White House.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 02:16 PM
link   
And not to mention about Murtha mentioning the heroes.

The article you posted...


Cellular telephone calls placed from the doomed plane led to suggestions Wednesday that a group effort to crash the craft and stop the attackers from reaching whatever may have been their intended target may have taken place.

"It sure wasn't going to go down in rural Pennsylvania," U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said Wednesday. "The target was Washington, D.C. Somebody made a heroic effort to keep the plane from hitting a populated area.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
I mean, isn't is more plausible that we shot down 93 then Mossad used super thermite to collaspe the WTC 1,2 and 7. Sensationalism is a major distraction that is used to easily sway those that will believe what is told to them without research.


If they are covering up the shoot down of flight 93 what else are they covering up ?

Still have not seen any evidence that will support planes or fires bringing down any of the WTC buildings, and where did the molten steel come from in the basements of 1,2,6 and 7 ?



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 03:17 PM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com... This is a good 93 starter thread.

As far as the WTC, people should look more into the architecture and the materials. One day hopefully it can all be put to rest.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
As far as the WTC, people should look more into the architecture and the materials. One day hopefully it can all be put to rest.


What does architure and matrial have to do with molten steel in the basements of 4 buildings.



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 04:33 PM
link   
This is about 93. not the molten steel. What are your thoughts on Flight 93?



posted on Feb, 5 2007 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
This is about 93. not the molten steel. What are your thoughts on Flight 93?


if you only want to talk about 93 stop trying to side track the thread into WTC.



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
This is about 93. not the molten steel. What are your thoughts on Flight 93?


Oh i do beleive flight 93 was shot down. But if the government is covering that up what else is it covering up. The official story has been proven to be full of holes.



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 02:01 AM
link   
So where is the proof, Esdad?

You have such a high standard of proof for what happened at the WTC that you must really have a rock-solid case to present us on Flight 93, right? Something irrefutable, and simple enough so that no one will misunderstand it. Because some people just don't get it. It has to be made impossibly obvious.



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 12:04 PM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Start with this. Look into Mineta and who he is connected to. A conspiracy is controlled by having the least amount of people you can involved. In this case it is Cheney, Mineta, the mystery man, the person in contact with the jets and an air force pilot. They would be the only ones who knew the truth about 93 if they wanted to. BS, why the hostility?



posted on Feb, 6 2007 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by esdad71
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Start with this. Look into Mineta and who he is connected to. A conspiracy is controlled by having the least amount of people you can involved. In this case it is Cheney, Mineta, the mystery man, the person in contact with the jets and an air force pilot. They would be the only ones who knew the truth about 93 if they wanted to. BS, why the hostility?


I wll have to see if i can find it again, thier is a video of the F-16 pilots getting medals. 1 of the pilots gets a little extra.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join