It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ape
eventually in time we will have what it takes to protect from a 'full' onslaught ( anyone who shoots a nuke at us will be having a massive amount of nukes going at them losing launch sites in the process). they are working on THAAD which was displayed on future weapons and so was the stategy, it looks sick, pure kinetic energy to take out the ICBM.
I dont know how far ahead the military is regards to a solid layered missile defense system, we certainly dont know the full scoop. 1 thing is for sure with the advancment of THEL/DEW and THAAD among others we are going to be untouchable in the future.
[edit on 29-1-2007 by ape]
Originally posted by cyberdude78
The other question is how effective the system is against MIRV carrying missiles. Because I'm no ballistic missile expert, but I'd imagine that there's a few that release their MIRV's before it's within range of THAAD.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
Will be untouchable from ballistic missiles in the future? Probably not, history shows that offensive technology tends advance more quickly than defensive technology.
xbadger
Even during WWII, the defensive positions was of paramount importance to helping Russia stave off German advances despite Germany's superior artillery and tactical bombers. Germans were simply not able to overcome the defenses of Stalingrad, Leningrad, Moscow
Originally posted by aaaaa
The danger of such missile defence is not that it deters rogue elements from launching missile attacks on the U.S., but that it makes an American first strike more likely.