It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Pirate Bay, one of the world's most popular websites for the illegal downloading of films through filesharing, has said it wanted to buy its own island in a bid to avoid copyright laws.
"It's not only about Pirate Bay, it's more about having a nation with no copyright laws," one of those behind the site, who gave his name only as Peter, told AFP Friday.
The group said it would consider any territory in international waters to avoid copyright legislation.
For Pirate Bay it would be awesome to have no copyright law. All countries today are based on the old economy and old ideas and we want to do something new," he added.
On Friday the group established a website -- buysealand.com, as a discussion forum and to raise funds to buy Sealand, a former British naval platform and self-proclaimed principality six miles (10 kilometres) off the eastern coast of Britain.
SOURCE:
PhysOrg.com
Originally posted by Nygdan
I thought that Sea Land specfically wasn't an autonomous nation, and that's why it was abandoned?
www.sealandgov.org...
Sealand was founded as a sovereign Principality in 1967 in international waters, six miles off the eastern shores of Britain
...
The location chosen was Roughs Tower, an island fortress created in World War II by Britain and subsequently abandoned to the jurisdiction of the High Seas. The independence of Sealand was upheld in a 1968 British court decision where the judge held that Roughs Tower stood in international waters and did not fall under the legal jurisdiction of the United Kingdom. This gave birth to Sealand's national motto of E Mare Libertas, or "From the Sea, Freedom".
Originally posted by iori_komei
I do not support copyright laws, as it is my opinion that if you
create something and put it out in public, you should do it
because you want to, not for profit.
Comments, Opinions?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Think about what you are saying man. If every musical artist, for example, had no protection from copyright law, I want you to tell me how they would get paid for any recording.
And please tell me how news agencies could sell their stories if any joe blow (hard) could come along and rip their story off. And that's just for starters.
Originally posted by iori_komei
I do not support copyright laws, as it is my opinion that if you
create something and put it out in public, you should do it
because you want to, not for profit.
geography.about.com...
In 2000, Sealand came into the news because a company called HavenCo Ltd planned on operating a complex of Internet servers at Sealand, out of the reach of governmental control. HavenCo gave the Bates $250,000 and stock to lease Rough's Tower and the company has the option to purchase Sealand in the future.
Originally posted by iori_komei
Well, in my opinion they should'nt be doing it for profit in the first place.
Though I do think that if a corporation or major Media/TV show wants
to use it, they should pay the artist.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Yeah these artists are so affected by all of this thats been going on for ages now. It affects them so badly that instead of getting diamond studded platinum tire valves they are forced to get plain ole platinum for their Bugatti Veyrons.
Originally posted by TruthMagnet
It's the next step in our social evolution - we musn't let the "modern day" luddites try to keep us from mankinds true future.
Originally posted by iori_komei
I do not support current copyright laws, as it is my opinion that if you
create something and put it out in public, you should do it
because you want to, not for profit.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
To the oblivious fool who knows nothing and doesn't care about what artists and other creative people really go through