It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.uruknet.info...
www.iraqirabita.org...
Well, there’s no proof Mr. Cheney really even backs it. Unnamed government officials with knowledge in the matter say the proposal comes from his office, but they stop short of saying it comes from Mr. Cheney himself.
Other top officials say it is highly unlikely that the administration would pursue such a radical course. (Of course, the radical nature of the Darwin Principle is all the more reason to assume it comes from Mr. Cheney himself.) But it is difficult to imagine the administration actually publicly announcing such a course even if it decided on it.
Can you just hear President Bush’s speech to the nation? “My Fellow Americans, the United States has decided that there are more Shiites than Sunnis in Iraq, so we are therefore going to side with the people most likely to win a fight to the death. We’ll figure out how to deal with the rest of the Arab world, where there are more Sunnis than Shiites, later.”
Still, somewhere deep inside the Beltway, someone has laid out the intellectual basis for the Shiite option. So some people with knowledge of the thinking behind the proposal were asked to explain it. None agreed to be identified, citing an administration edict against talking about President Bush’s change-of-strategy in Iraq before the president articulates exactly what that change will be.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Turns out it's the badr brigades that are boming their own shia people to propell their secterian agenda. Ofcource by the instruction of the US. And the shia's of the mehdi army know it.
His name is Firas Al-Rikabi. He confesses in this video (in Arabic) that Hakam, who lives in the nearby Rashad district, had given him the bomb and the detonator and instructed him to place it among the crowd and blow it up, for $200 bounty….
--[snip]--
Hakam belongs to the Badr and SCIRI Iranian backed shi'ite militias….
Article
Hakam belongs to the Badr and SCIRI who now control the police in the Interior Ministry (who are responsible for the recent mass kidnappings) and the army in the Defence Ministry (being trained to step up by the American occupiers to allow Bush to step down).
Hakam belongs to the Badr and SCIRI Iranian backed shi'ite militias who now control the police in the Interior Ministry (who are responsible for the recent mass kidnappings) and the army in the Defence Ministry (being trained to step up by the American occupiers to allow Bush to step down).
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Ofcource, i am violently apposed to the occupation.
Originally posted by missed_gear
Let’s look at the crucial part that you posted...almost and exact copy of the article except:
Hakam belongs to the Badr and SCIRI who now control the police in the Interior Ministry (who are responsible for the recent mass kidnappings) and the army in the Defence Ministry (being trained to step up by the American occupiers to allow Bush to step down).
The article states (what was left out in bold):
Hakam belongs to the Badr and SCIRI Iranian backed shi'ite militias who now control the police in the Interior Ministry (who are responsible for the recent mass kidnappings) and the army in the Defence Ministry (being trained to step up by the American occupiers to allow Bush to step down).
Flagrant isin’t it?
mg
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
lol i'm not apposed to iraq's liberation, on the contrary.
Violently apposed meaning, i support violent opposition to the occupation.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
It's no secret that Iran backs the SCIRI.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
So what are you people talking about? Anyone who knows anything about who the SCIRI are knows that iran created them. There would be no point in what you accuse me off.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
Anyway i copied the link from a different forum and put down the site of the original source.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
I take no responsibility for what may have been missing.
Originally posted by NumberCruncher
Violently apposed meaning, i support violent opposition to the occupation.
So let me get this straight, you support Suicide Bombers, Snipers etc attacking and Killing US, British, Australian and other Coaltion Soldiers and Military representives going about there Mission Inside Iraq ?
Originally posted by Gools
Well duh!
It never ceases to amaze me how many Americans can't fathom that somebody would be against their brand of aggressive hegemony.
Somebody is drinking too much Kool-aid. :shk:
.
Please show where your article shows US involvement....wait...you can't right?
So…you are admitting your interpretation of the article as posted is false!...completely false and a lie!… grossly intentional…especially given your obvious admitted knowledge…!!!!
When did you once mention Iran is behind the brigade?!!!...You only accused the US?!...