It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MONROE, LA. (AP) — The new science policy for public schools in one north Louisiana parish is "an underhanded way to undercut the theory of evolution"
...
The policy adopted Wednesday night for Ouachita Parish was enthusiastically backed by officials with the Louisiana Family Forum, which gives its mission as "to persuasively present biblical principles in the centers of influence on issues affecting the family through research, communication and networking."
...
That is based on a false premise, Lynn said: "That is, that there's a scientific controversy about evolution. There isn't a scientific controversy. There's a religious one. There's no need to invite teachers — as I think this does — invite teachers to talk about creationism, talk about intelligent design as if they were alternatives to evolution, which they are not."
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Would that be ok with the Creation/ID proponents? If not, why not?
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
What exactly is wrong with Intelligent design theory?
what is wrong with having it taught in schools?
Most science teachers I know, even in COLLEGE, will stop at a point and say, "ok, science does not have an explanation for this ______ (inset some phenomenon here) so it will be up to the theological realms to debate it."
like it or not religion does and always has had a place in our society, You dont have to be a bunch dicks and try your best to alienate it.
Besides, Evolution is just a theory and one that I feel has never had conclusive evidence to support it in the scientific world.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Evolution, Atomic and Gravity theories all differ from the ID 'theory' in that they:
Have testable hypotheses.
These hypotheses have been tested and results made public.
The tests have been performed by multiple, independent researchers.
The methodology of the tests have been reviewed by multiple, independent researchers.
I ask again: Does Creationism/ID fit these criteria? I have yet to see any indication of this.
Where is the hypocracy?
edit for typo
[edit on 3-12-2006 by Open_Minded Skeptic]
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
What exactly is wrong with Intelligent design theory? what is wrong with having it taught in schools?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
So, none of the people who are so adamant about teaching ID in schools are willing to even take on my question?
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
What testable hypotheses exist regarding ID?
If such hypotheses exist, what are the results of the tests?
Have such tests been conducted by multiple, independent researchers?
Has the methodology of such tests been reviewed by independent researchers, with no investment in the answer?
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I have had biology instructors flat out say they do not believe in evolution because there are too many minute differences between humans and primates for us to have had evolved for them in the time frame proposed.
What testable hypotheses exist regarding ID?