 |
|
Topic started on 7-11-2002 @ 01:27 PM by Bout Time
|
My Fellow Americans: it was on this day two years ago - Election Day 2000 - that all the horrendous crap we've been going through lately began in
earnest.
Some words from the past for the two years ahead:
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been
enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavour to prolong it's reign by working
upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."
- Abraham Lincoln
*** *** ***
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic
State itself. What, in its essence, is Fascism, but ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."
- Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 09:20 AM by Bob88
|
quoting great leaders is so passČ, BT.
[Edited on 8-11-2002 by Bob88]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 09:45 AM by Bout Time
|
There are none now, and we haven't had one for two years, so I got to be inspired somewhere!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 10:38 AM by ultra_phoenix
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 12:57 PM by Bob88
|
You were reading my mind UP.
BT, if you're looking to quote great leaders you need not look that far back, Reagan will more than suffice.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 01:24 PM by Bout Time
|
As a matter of record, reagan was a great and inspiring speaker to many( he was my first presidential vote - so he had me fooled for a bit too!). But
there has never been a more detached and uninvolved president in our life time. He delegated everything and failed to do what makes that a sound
management device - occasional check ups and audits of their actions.Till we get to the hindsight point on this Bush administration, that will stand
as the yard stick of incompetence. All the proof you need is the number of pardons, including felons, that Reagan and Bush had to dole out to former
administration players.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 01:51 PM by Bob88
|
geez, BT. You're a sucker for the liberal propaganda machine. You must have come down w/ a bad case of the stockholm syndrome. Reagan was very hands
on, wrote many of his own speeches (not to mention all of them prior to becoming president) - don't believe the hype.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 02:26 PM by Bout Time
|
Originally posted by Bob88
geez, BT. You're a sucker for the liberal propaganda machine. You must have come down w/ a bad case of the stockholm syndrome. Reagan was very hands
on, wrote many of his own speeches (not to mention all of them prior to becoming president) - don't believe the hype.

I don't subscribe to propaganda, that's why you guys argue my points without data to back you up - you're raise on propaganda!
Reagan was no where near hands on. How can you drop that crap with a straight face? Testimony from Iran/Contra, Bush I quotes, and people from his
administration as well as official biographers said he delegated everything and managed by summary. Grand Delegator is a title he's known by, for Be
Jeebus sakes!!!
Go to Google or any search engine and type in 'Grand Delegator' & "reagan' or just 'Grand Delegator' and tell me what you find.
Really Bob, stop believing the hype. He was a great president in one facet of the job: he spoke well and inspired by his words, something that was
needed at the time in a large degree.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 02:31 PM by Thomas Crowne
|
Originally posted by Bout Time
As a matter of record, reagan was a great and inspiring speaker to many( he was my first presidential vote - so he had me fooled for a bit too!). But
there has never been a more detached and uninvolved president in our life time. He delegated everything and failed to do what makes that a sound
management device - occasional check ups and audits of their actions.Till we get to the hindsight point on this Bush administration, that will stand
as the yard stick of incompetence. All the proof you need is the number of pardons, including felons, that Reagan and Bush had to dole out to former
administration players. 
Awesome points. I love the "data", and what "fact" - really, there's no propaganda here?
Sheesh.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 07:04 PM by Bout Time
|
You put the guy up on a pedestal, so I know you have not looked into it. But it's there. The key defense for all the crap that went on was " it went
on without his knowledge". You buy that as a defense but don't see it as uninvolved, detatched management!?!
Sheesh.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 07:07 PM by Thomas Crowne
|
Maybe you and I, because of different priorities in core issues, see the same situation in a different light. I imagine that if you cut our positions
in half the truth would be near.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-11-2002 @ 07:08 PM by FreeMason
|
Bout Time there is a lot of leftist propoganda about bush and that's so far been your strongest point against him....yet you don't like
propoganda?
Sincerely,
no signature
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-11-2002 @ 10:12 AM by Estragon
|
I fancy Gerald Ford would be a strong competitor in any "total dud of recent times" list.
One must, I guess, separate the man from the policies and achievements - and it's not unfair to say that Reagan had his share of successes (how far
he was personally responsible - or even vaguely aware of what was going on - is, of course, a different issue).
On the general "anniversary" theme -one imagines that the late great JL will be gracing the airwaves soon with "And so this is Christmas, and what
have we done?"
I fear bad words for Afghanistan soon, and the British Government has been releasing the most alarmist official and leaked statements suggesting
more dreadful acts in the West.
May be Tony's bid at a copy of GWB's patriot act and other wizard wheezes; but I really do not feel that there is any less fear now than there
was a year or so ago.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-11-2002 @ 05:20 PM by MidnightDStroyer
|
IMO, it doesn't matter which party "wins"...The People still lose. The only difference is the *rate of speed* that the People lose.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 10:26 AM by Bout Time
|
Originally posted by FreeMason
Bout Time there is a lot of leftist propoganda about bush and that's so far been your strongest point against him....yet you don't like
propoganda? 
If only the meds were in proper dosage, perhaps you would have turned out.....different
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 10:29 AM by Bout Time
|
Originally posted by Estragon
one imagines that the late great JL will be gracing the airwaves soon with "And so this is Christmas, and what have we done?" 
"let's hope it's a good one, without any Fear"
It is a more dangerous world with more attacks pending.......policy change, anyone?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 10:42 AM by Estragon
|
And "War is over:if you want it" -I'd not be inclined to elevate the world's greatest Pop-writers beyond their station - but there's something
there.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 10:46 AM by Estragon
|
It is no good thing to be approaching every public, and every confined, space with a degree of trepidation: the good Lord, our own folly, and Nature
gave us enough to fear - one would wish our leaders lightened the burden.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 10:48 AM by Thomas Crowne
|
LOL! MD, you and I may not agree on every single issue, but we certainly understand the old saying about if someone owns all the horses in the race,
he doesn't care which one wins!
No matter what issues I am in agreement with in regards to the Republican party, the fact that they have no intentions or desire to set the nation
back on the path the founding fathers placed us on to begin with makes it clear that they are not for us, anymore than the democrats or any other type
of politician.
Don't forget to rub that in my face in two years when I'm ill about the repubs doing nothing but playing politics and getting nothing done. The
good thing is, since they will control the house, senate and the oval office, they'll have hardly anyone to blame but themselves.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-11-2002 @ 03:55 PM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Originally posted by Thomas CrowneThe good thing is, since they will control the house, senate and the oval office, they'll have hardly
anyone to blame but themselves. 
Instead of waiting for them (IE: politicians) to cause more damage & *then* place blame, why not stand up as a Nation United & *prevent* that damage
from occuring in the first place?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |