It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gaia is Hurting
Gaia Scientist Lovelock
Predicts Planetary Wipeout
Jeremy Lovell, Reuters
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/november2006/281106_b_Gaia.htm
The earth has a fever that could boost temperatures by 8 degrees Celsius making large parts of the surface uninhabitable and threatening billions of peoples' lives, a controversial climate scientist said on Tuesday.
James Lovelock, who angered climate scientists with his Gaia theory of a living planet and then alienated environmentalists by backing nuclear power, said a traumatized earth might only be able to support less than a tenth of it's 6 billion people.
"We are not all doomed. An awful lot of people will die, but I don't see the species dying out," he told a news conference. "A hot earth couldn't support much over 500 million."
"Almost all of the systems that have been looked at are in positive feedback ... and soon those effects will be larger than any of the effects of carbon dioxide emissions from industry and so on around the world," he added.
Most of us are quite aware of some of the elites plans to decrease the number of individuals on earth. I just wonder if ths whole idea of the earth being overloaded is not somehow connected to the elite's excuse for wanting to decrease the population.
Originally posted by etshrtslr
It does beg the question on how does it get there....war, famine, natural disaters or a combination of them all.
Depopulating
"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels!" WHO DO YOU THINK SAID THAT? HITLER? STALIN? NO, it was the Queen's HUBBY! Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh !
Plans are underway now, implemented by the New World Order Elite, to depopulate the planet's 6-7 billion people to a manageable level of between 500 million- 2 billion.
There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finally, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.
Other methods used include; the build-up and use of nuclear, chemical and biological agents, weapons and warfare, the poisoning and contamination of the planet's food and water supplies, the introduction and use of deadly pharmaceutical drugs in society, weather modification and the triggering of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis through electromagnetic psychotropic weapons both on Earth and in space, the promotion of homosexuality to limit population growth and spread the deadly AIDS virus, forced sterilization in countries such as China, forced vaccinations, abortion, euthanasia etc...
A hot earth couldn't support much over 500 million.
Originally posted by etshrtslr
Most of us are quite aware of some of the elites plans to decrease the number of individuals on earth. I just wonder if ths whole idea of the earth being overloaded is not somehow connected to the elite's excuse for wanting to decrease the population.
Ive seen the 500-600 million number from several different sources. I does make one wonder if there is some orchestrated effort going on to make sure thats where the earth population ends up.
It does beg the question on how does it get there....war, famine, natural disaters or a combination of them all.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Interesting topic. My personal opinion is LoveLock's a whacko but the idea that a certain population number keeps being mentioned is extremely interesting.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
What makes you think LoveLock is a "whacko?" He actually revolutionized environmental science from the deadpan science it once was.
[edit on 29-11-2006 by SpeakerofTruth]
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Sure. Maybe I used a bad example. Time frames aren't really relevent. My position is that as of today, there is not enough data, or understanding of the inter-relations of the many separate systems involved, to accurately model and/or predict future changes in the global climate.
Originally posted by apex
What sort of natural disaster could kill 6,500,000,000 people anyway? Even Yellowstone or Toba is minuscule in comparison. Perhaps a volcanic eruption like the Deccan Traps (512,000 cubic kilometres, or 190 times bigger than Toba, perhaps VEI 10) could do it, other than that it would need to be an asteroid to do it quickly.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by whatukno
No boats, no lights, no motorcars, not a single luxury like Robinson Caruso as primitive as can be. As primitive as can be.