It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warpboost
Absolutely plausible??? Please explain how you think an underground train that can travel MACH 2 is plausible?
Or that LADAR can see thru solid objects,
that there could be a 109 MILLION MAN army living underground
or that the F117 uses Alien or ET technology???
how about some facts or evidence that any of this stuff exists?
I'm not saying that there aren't DUMBs,
but some of the ideas sound like someones fantasy
and perhaps someday they will become reality,
but I have yet to see anything that proves otherwise
What exactly makes it seem to impossible in your opinion? I mean we have commercial Mag-Lev type systems ( without military involvement ) with civilian oversight, budget considerations and no vacuum that reach top speeds of 430 km/h within their 30 km shuttle range? Is it so odd to believe that Mach two trains could be in operation between secret government underground facilities; it's after all not their money but yours?
LOL! Is that a joke?
Maybe it has 0.0000017% Alien technology; feel free to try prove otherwise.
black helicopters
Under ground 100 million man army
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
...
The only low-speed maglev (100 km/h) currently operational, the Japanese Linimo HSST, cost approximately US$100 million/km to build. Now your saying they can do it at mach 2, UNDERGROUND, and accross the whole world, because some guy on the internet said so?
...
Originally posted by PisTonZOR
The only low-speed maglev (100 km/h) currently operational, the Japanese Linimo HSST, cost approximately US$100 million/km to build.
Now your saying they can do it at mach 2, UNDERGROUND, and accross the whole world, because some guy on the internet said so?
LOL! Is that a joke?
What type of helicopters are these? Where are they built? Did they appear out of nowhere? Did China build them? Did a fleet of black helicopters just be built as normal blackhawks yet noone realized there were more blackhawks then revealed?
It's called evidence. You will need some before you make outlandish claims.
Originally posted by etherical waterwave
the now becoming famous 100 million men army here. :p
they could've done some cloning and breeding down there to, right?
besides, how many people dissapear a year in america? doesn't take much effort to get them down there and mind control them to killers, don't they. hm, reminds me of the movie Conspiray Theory... (a good way to explain to the mass MK-Ultra did exist)
this thread is getting bigger.. good thing
P.S. Nice work StellarX
Originally posted by Aim64C
Assume we have these drilling machines and using them for such a project. Where does all the dirt go? If we go as far as suspecting fission or fusion technology - you could simply vaporize it or plasmate it.... but you still have to move it somewhere. And if you're digging out cubic MILES of dirt - someone is going to notice. You can't just build a massive underground base in a top-secret hangar like you can a plane.
Originally posted by Aim64C
Ah, this age old tale.
Here's a few operational obstacles, though. Assume we have these drilling machines and using them for such a project. Where does all the dirt go? If we go as far as suspecting fission or fusion technology - you could simply vaporize it or plasmate it.... but you still have to move it somewhere.
And if you're digging out cubic MILES of dirt - someone is going to notice. You can't just build a massive underground base in a top-secret hangar like you can a plane.
We also always seem to assume the worst when something 'secret' is going on. "They are building a massive underground chamber - let's assume it is NOT for our good."
We've seen far too many horror movies. If these bases do exist - and I beleive there is SOME credibility
.... on a smaller scale .... and they are funded with drug money - then I would like to beleive that they are for the civilians (I am no longer one of those!) who have not whored themselves out to drugs and addictions. A way of filtering out the slime so that everything esle will survive.
Either that or be a facility that prevents said disasters.
But we always have to assume the worst. Because our government is out to destroy us.
The media is our true enemy - don't let them distract you.
There are far too many people in the military that would not stand for the perposterous plans that have been suggested -
and a thousand angry marines with guns and a few tanks would demolish a 'government plan' of that nature like a hoboe attacking a bisciut. Add in the other branches - and it just won't fly at all.
Doesn't matter how many stars that officer has on his/her collar - or how many chevrons a senior enlisted wears - if their colegues and the 'grunts' view it as something that is against the people - it's NOT going to happen - or at least not without the military dividing and having it's own little civil war.
I think I can speak for most of my fellow sailors when I say that we'd not stand for something like that.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The onus of proof is on the one making the assertion.
If you make a claim, you need to provide proof, not expect the other party to disprove your assertion. Disproof of a negative is just poor logic.
Then you have statements like this-
"Conventional explosives outside the building in a truck can just not do that as far as my knowledge goes."
What is your background to give you any authority on this subject?
A shaped charge makes nice neat holes(they're known as cutting charges), so that's not what you'd use to knock down a structure.
The ammonium nitrate that McVeigh used, was more omni directional, providing overpressure, which is consistent with the effects witnessed on the building in Oklahoma.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Oh, and Alex Jones isn't exactly the most credible source for anything. I wouldn't ask him directions to the bus station.
Originally posted by GT100FV
So expecting evidence for an assertion, is a way of suppressing the truth?
It's one thing to be open minded, but when considering information, one must consider the veracity.
All assertions aren't equally valid.
You have to look at the soundness of the assertions before assigning them credibility.
I'm open minded, but skeptical. I ask myself, is this plausible, credible, reasonable, etc...
One can use principals of logic to analyze claims-
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which the conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from, previously known facts (the premises). If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. This is distinguished