posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 08:46 PM
Yeah you’re actually right about Saddam’s son Uday being extremely evil. However I still don't see it as reason for ending the Ba’th regime, or
justifying the killing 650,000 Iraqis (and of course more to come).
Saddam would have been better of just killing Uday. Uday was a psychopath with something wrong in his head; and at one time came very close to being
killed by Saddam. Though this source doesn’t mention that specifically it gives just one of the reasons why…
Of course any other father could just hand a dangerous son to the police. But when you’re the dictator of a country; it doesn’t look very good.
People around you might think you’re a bit weird putting your son in a cage-noise (even if in any other country that’s where he would belong).
Uday had his advantages: he was smart and somewhat useful. However I don’t deny that he was evil; or that the world would be better of without him
(and indeed is).