It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The [Madrid] Windsor Building was of a similar truss design to the twin towers, the fire started 11 stories from the top of the building, and it burned at temperatures of 800ºC for more than 18 hours [AFP]. The core of the building did not fail.
Originally posted by ANOK
You want us to believe because a bridge had structural failure that a building would collapse down on itself, ejecting tons of steel up to 600 ft, and turning concrete and office furniture into a fine dust? All from fires that lasted less than an hour?
And no it wasn't the plane, the building survived the planes impact, you would have to be completely dense to argue that.
And no it wasn't the plane, the building survived the planes impact, you would have to be completely dense to argue that.
Our take...
The Madrid Windsor fire is sometimes cited as being relevant to the WTC collapse, but in reality there are major differences between the two situations.
No plane flew into the Madrid Windsor Tower, for instance. It didn't sustain any structural damage prior to the fire beginning. (And for those who keep emailing us to say that neither did WTC7, reports of the damage there are covered here.)
The Madrid Windsor Tower was much smaller than the WTC, too, at 32 storeys.
More significantly, the design of the Madrid Windsor Tower was entirely different to that of the WTC.
Instead of trying to reach for excuses for the WTC collapses, wake up! The truth is staring you in the face.
"USA Today and Navy Times are both part of the Gannett family of news outlets. Gannett also publishes Air Force Times, Army Times, Marine Corp Times, Armed Forces Journal, Military Market, Military City, and Defense News. In other words, it's just your typical independent, civilian media organization.
Having established that, let's now take a look at who our group of mystery witnesses are (or who they were at the time of the Pentagon attack):
Other "eyewitnesses"...
Bob Dubill was the executive editor for USA Today.
Mary Ann Owens was a journalist for Gannett.
Richard Benedetto was a reporter for USA Today.
Christopher Munsey was a reporter for Navy Times.
Vin Narayanan was a reporter for USA Today.
Joel Sucherman was a multimedia editor for USA Today.
Mike Walter was a reporter for USA Today.
Steve Anderson was the director of communications for USA Today.
Fred Gaskins was the national editor for USA Today.
Mark Faram was a reporter for Navy Times."
Originally posted by JIMC5499
The main arguement that I have seen here is that the fire couldn't possibly have weakened the structure enough for it to collapse. Well the photos of the beams in the story I posted disprove that.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
If your logic is correct then that bridge would have fallen down on the highway below it and the picture would show that. But there is no parallel with what happened at the WTC at all.
If a gasoline fire can cause that huge I-beam to warp that badly, then how come it is so hard to believe that a jet fuel fire can't do the same to the smaller I-beams in the WTC tower's structure?
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
One thing that I distinctly remember about 9-11 is of the people that had came out of the elevators on fire. This tells me that not only did the jet fuel start fires on the effected floors, it also spread to other floors. The jet fuel had went down the elevator shafts on fire, therefore it set the whole core of both buildings ablaze.
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
One thing that I distinctly remember about 9-11 is of the people that had came out of the elevators on fire. This tells me that not only did the jet fuel start fires on the effected floors, it also spread to other floors. The jet fuel had went down the elevator shafts on fire, therefore it set the whole core of both buildings ablaze.
Originally posted by gimmefootball400
One thing that I distinctly remember about 9-11 is of the people that had came out of the elevators on fire. This tells me that not only did the jet fuel start fires on the effected floors, it also spread to other floors. The jet fuel had went down the elevator shafts on fire, therefore it set the whole core of both buildings ablaze.