I don't know, I read the article, and it seems to be very....desperate.
Basically, 80% of the article is about how the satellite supposedly used can't see very far into the water. Ok,cool.
But the fact still remains that the boats with the sonar, the strongest piece of evidence, turned up nothing.
Conclusive? No, it's still possible that something large could be living in there. Still possible that several large creatures (which is how many
you'd need to survive) are living in there? I guess. But the arguement presented in the article seems really to be reaching for any techincal detail,
while the weight of evidence is clearly against them in this case, no matter how you slice it.
Unless the creatures (and I do say creatures because there would have to be more than one) deliberately were ALL hiding from this sonar scan that day
and had ALL buried themselves in the mud on the bottom of the lake (as the article suggests), then it doesn't look good for Nessie fans.
[Edited on 12-11-2003 by SevenZeroOne]

